in inf i must say 10/10/10 is better build than 20 armor /10 range. try it on simulator.

i agree with minpk, 10 armor 20 damage won againts 10 armor 20 range, relax minpk peoples just get use to it using range, so they wont bother to find the fact, 10 armor and 20 damage is better and CHEAPER! it not just effective it also efficient, here i got a prove, a real prove that range mean nothing

the pic bellow show that im using armor and damage, the opponent use pure range, and by mats he cost 3 times than me but still i won, i try to simmulate it and add some armor to him, still i won again, check it out

Dunno why other people does a squad for infantry like this.....21 range vs. 9 armor while it is the same as 20 range and 10 armor...while the second built is cheaper.

they are the same lol. The efficiency in 21 range is a little bit higher, but the result are someway or another the same. The 1 range 1 armor difference is not much to mention.



And about ur picture, breeco.

First, u have totally chassis advantages: inf against veh. Plus u're focused on veh, seeing u have lots of anti veh units.

Second, enemy doesn't have any armor, or even damage to guard his range. That's not even considered a build at all. This is not a probuild.

And to repost wat have been posted three times.

If u do a battle sim, 5 inf squads with 3 probuild squads.

If u do 5 inf squads as probuild, u'll win with 40 armor lost
But if u do 5 inf squads as 20 damage 10 armor build, u'll still win, but with 50 armor plus 13 damage loss.

This get better when u do the 3 squads with 20 damage 10 armor build:
5 inf squads as probuild: 29 armor loss
20 damage 10 armor build: all armor loss plus 3 damage.

Now tell me, which one is better?

sorry i dont get that... explain it again what should i simmulate?

1. u said that we CANT tell peoples what r we sending, n how many the opponent should put army to defend, right? so we scan? thats what i did, i scan n i saw his army are fully vehicle, so i sent my Anti vehicle which is 1/3 (by mats cost) of his army ... boom i won , now u said its not fair ...

2. on the last argue i always talking about battle simmulator, ur probuild vs my probuild, and using same chasis to avoid bonuses, but u said "in reality its immposible to tell the opponent how many army they put to defend"

so now im really confuse, what can i do to prove that damage are better? using simmulator ? or battle report? Your Call

ok so u scan and see he has 50 veh, so u send 50 vehs to kill him?

First, scan has its inaccuracy. He might have 60, or even 80 vehicles. Or maybe he only has 20. However, the chance of having more than 50 can't be discarded.

Second, is it better to send 100 vehicles, instead of just sending 50? You don't scan and send the same amount. Again, you scan, spam or watever you do to get the number of units of the enemies. Then you send a larger forces to kill them, not sending the same forces as they have.

And in your images, the enemy is not using the probuild. The probuild always have a mix between armor and range, more specifically, 2 range : 1 armor or 7 range : 3 armor. While he uses only range, of course he'll be killed easily, if not in one round. Not to mention you are completely advantaged against him.

If you do a battle simulation between a larger forces against a smaller forces, pro build or not, larger forces win. However, with a probuild, your loss will be less than other builds. This is one main reason why probuild is considered better than the others. It minimized your loss and maximized your troops efficiency.

This image proves that his army is the best ever. Just let him have his victory. Stop trying to convince everyone to use the same build. If they want to use bad builds, let them.

I stopped trying long ago.

I like that people think damage units are good(unless they are on my team). It lets me kill them with less loss then i should have. More exp for my troops with less loss to my armor win win.