Author |
Message |
bossbozz
|
Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:44 am |
|
Corporal |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 7:58 pm Posts: 59
|
deathral22 wrote: post br's when you can. And i will post mine tonight. I concurred the first Knaw member
Yeah that newb called omg a veteran has the first concur.
You mad?
Good fight Knaw. The endgame should be fun No you didn't, you conquered Zal who had already lost his army and left the alliance so we could not defend him. Hardly an achievement, typical opportunist play we've come to expect from LAW. If we didn't have FEAR and S0LD headed to our relic then you would have been cut off at the point of origin and killed.
_________________ GS "Perfect 10" Earth 5 - Era 1 - 1 Alliance - No Subs
|
|
Top |
|
deathral22
|
Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 1:56 pm |
|
Specialist |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:20 pm Posts: 21
|
bossbozz wrote: deathral22 wrote: post br's when you can. And i will post mine tonight. I concurred the first Knaw member
Yeah that newb called omg a veteran has the first concur.
You mad?
Good fight Knaw. The endgame should be fun No you didn't, you conquered Zal who had already lost his army and left the alliance so we could not defend him. Hardly an achievement, typical opportunist play we've come to expect from LAW. If we didn't have FEAR and S0LD headed to our relic then you would have been cut off at the point of origin and killed. Wait, clearly I don't know the meaning of the word lost. I thought lost meant "no longer possessed or retained" but you seem to have a different idea. Because i believe there was a battle report on his colony, and he had at least 10 squads. Secondly, what are you whining about. All i see is OMG NEWB WE ABUSED GAMEPLAY MECHANICS AND IT BIT US IN THE BUTT AND NOW WE ARE WHINING BECAUSE YOU COUNTERED OUR GAMEPLAY MECHANICS ABUSE. YOU USED SKILL WHILE WE LACKED STRATEGY. are you the same type of people that whine when all you make is infantry and the other guy uses concussive units. You choose a strategy to avoid losing a fight head on, that strategy had a downside, i utilized that downside, you call me an oppurtunist, when you abuse bugs? Seriously? Your terrible, stop pretending you are good.
|
|
Top |
|
AnitsuEx
|
Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:37 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:20 pm Posts: 1275
|
Your alliance used farms nuff said.
Don't talk.
Conquering someone that had no alliance is not hard... in fact, one with a small army.
Might I add...he wasn't active...he had a small army... no alliance... uh...hard?
Very much!!
_________________ 【Wins】 - 【12】 【Earth】【RoL】【RoL】【SoTF】【DoP】 【Mars】 【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【COPS】【DRAW】 【Fantasy】【EB】【Wolf】
|
|
Top |
|
deathral22
|
Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 4:58 pm |
|
Specialist |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:20 pm Posts: 21
|
AnitsuEx wrote: Your alliance used farms nuff said.
Don't talk.
Conquering someone that had no alliance is not hard... in fact, one with a small army.
Might I add...he wasn't active...he had a small army... no alliance... uh...hard?
Very much!! so wait. LAVV was using farms. Thats a lie and you know it. He had a larger army then me. I assume that that means i did well. I'm not very active, or i would be top 100. My alliance didn't help me. He had the advantage on me. He had more units then me, more crystals, was located on a freakin island, and neither of us had alliance support. I won, he didn't, and i'm called a newb for it. and i didn't use farms to help me win. I'm proving a point here. Stop calling people newbs and play the game. You lost, stop whining
|
|
Top |
|
juanito
|
Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 5:47 pm |
|
Corporal |
 |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:08 pm Posts: 75 Gender: male
|
dont trash talk and talk abouth the battles. Lot of more interesting things happened today, like various atack to the relics, knaw swapping members, knaw, SoLD nap ended. Lot of thing to talk and you complaining for a weak conquer without aliances and farms. Make this war great.
|
|
Top |
|
bossbozz
|
Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:10 pm |
|
Corporal |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 7:58 pm Posts: 59
|
deathral22 wrote: Wait, clearly I don't know the meaning of the word lost. I thought lost meant "no longer possessed or retained" but you seem to have a different idea. Because i believe there was a battle report on his colony, and he had at least 10 squads.
Secondly, what are you whining about. All i see is OMG NEWB WE ABUSED GAMEPLAY MECHANICS AND IT BIT US IN THE BUTT AND NOW WE ARE WHINING BECAUSE YOU COUNTERED OUR GAMEPLAY MECHANICS ABUSE. YOU USED SKILL WHILE WE LACKED STRATEGY.
are you the same type of people that whine when all you make is infantry and the other guy uses concussive units. You choose a strategy to avoid losing a fight head on, that strategy had a downside, i utilized that downside, you call me an oppurtunist, when you abuse bugs? Seriously? Your terrible, stop pretending you are good.
Yes he lost his army and left us to make room for a substitute while he rebuilt. You came here claiming to have conquered one of us but you hadn't, he had no alliance. If he was still with us you wouldn't have even tried to attack him. Zal still ranks higher than you even though you conquered him! Please post the BR, I see your rank dropped like a stone. Or shall I just get it from Zal instead?
_________________ GS "Perfect 10" Earth 5 - Era 1 - 1 Alliance - No Subs
|
|
Top |
|
Dylan102
|
Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:19 am |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:36 pm Posts: 351 Location: New Zealand Gender: male
|
SoLD came to the party. It was short lived D:  Attackers : Army worth : 1668400 metal, 690100 oil and 9783 soldiers. Loses : 821300 metal, 278000 oil and 5433 soldiers. Performance : 44% Defenders : Army worth : 2161850 metal, 857550 oil and 13043 soldiers. Defenders lost all units.
_________________

 MGH - OS - SPAM - COPS - Nam - TLD - DUMB - KnaW - TTM - SoTF - KOOL - HAHA
|
|
Top |
|
GodBob
|
Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:51 am |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:03 am Posts: 35 Gender: male
|
Nicely done knaW
_________________ ElitE*GoD$
|
|
Top |
|
Xeeron
|
Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:41 am |
|
Second Lieutenant |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 4:13 pm Posts: 170
|
That was a nice move Knaw, we underestimated your quickness at tick change  Strangly enough, I never felt that happy before about losing my army: Finally a very boring round will become fun for SoLD. We never liked being the top dog. Much better to pull the win from behind. So, as we said before: Hope this will become a long (and fun) war! - Xeeron
|
|
Top |
|
AnitsuEx
|
Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:03 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:20 pm Posts: 1275
|
Xeeron wrote: That was a nice move Knaw, we underestimated your quickness at tick change  Strangly enough, I never felt that happy before about losing my army: Finally a very boring round will become fun for SoLD. We never liked being the top dog. Much better to pull the win from behind. So, as we said before: Hope this will become a long (and fun) war! - Xeeron Nice post. However, this won't be a long war anymore. We will deal as much damage as we possibly can before going down! Good luck.  ____________ Battle ReportsMy lost to FEAR;  Battle against a LAW member;  Battle against LAW member, bad quality.  Battle against a DIP member;  Battle against SoLD on Relic 6. 
_________________ 【Wins】 - 【12】 【Earth】【RoL】【RoL】【SoTF】【DoP】 【Mars】 【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【COPS】【DRAW】 【Fantasy】【EB】【Wolf】
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|

|