It is currently Fri Jul 18, 2025 4:53 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 152 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 16  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs
PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:44 am 
Corporal
Corporal
 Profile

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 7:58 pm
Posts: 59
deathral22 wrote:
post br's when you can.
And i will post mine tonight. I concurred the first Knaw member

Yeah that newb called omg a veteran has the first concur.

You mad?

Good fight Knaw. The endgame should be fun


No you didn't, you conquered Zal who had already lost his army and left the alliance so we could not defend him. Hardly an achievement, typical opportunist play we've come to expect from LAW. If we didn't have FEAR and S0LD headed to our relic then you would have been cut off at the point of origin and killed.

_________________
GS "Perfect 10" Earth 5 - Era 1 - 1 Alliance - No Subs


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs
PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 1:56 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
 Profile

Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:20 pm
Posts: 21
bossbozz wrote:
deathral22 wrote:
post br's when you can.
And i will post mine tonight. I concurred the first Knaw member

Yeah that newb called omg a veteran has the first concur.

You mad?

Good fight Knaw. The endgame should be fun


No you didn't, you conquered Zal who had already lost his army and left the alliance so we could not defend him. Hardly an achievement, typical opportunist play we've come to expect from LAW. If we didn't have FEAR and S0LD headed to our relic then you would have been cut off at the point of origin and killed.



Wait, clearly I don't know the meaning of the word lost. I thought lost meant "no longer possessed or retained" but you seem to have a different idea. Because i believe there was a battle report on his colony, and he had at least 10 squads.


Secondly, what are you whining about. All i see is OMG NEWB WE ABUSED GAMEPLAY MECHANICS AND IT BIT US IN THE BUTT AND NOW WE ARE WHINING BECAUSE YOU COUNTERED OUR GAMEPLAY MECHANICS ABUSE. YOU USED SKILL WHILE WE LACKED STRATEGY.

are you the same type of people that whine when all you make is infantry and the other guy uses concussive units. You choose a strategy to avoid losing a fight head on, that strategy had a downside, i utilized that downside, you call me an oppurtunist, when you abuse bugs? Seriously?
Your terrible, stop pretending you are good.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs
PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:37 pm 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:20 pm
Posts: 1275
Your alliance used farms nuff said.

Don't talk.

Conquering someone that had no alliance is not hard... in fact, one with a small army.

Might I add...he wasn't active...he had a small army... no alliance... uh...hard?

Very much!!

_________________
【Wins】 - 【12】
【Earth】【RoL】【RoL】【SoTF】【DoP】
【Mars】 【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【COPS】【DRAW】
【Fantasy】【EB】【Wolf】


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs
PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 4:58 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
 Profile

Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:20 pm
Posts: 21
AnitsuEx wrote:
Your alliance used farms nuff said.

Don't talk.

Conquering someone that had no alliance is not hard... in fact, one with a small army.

Might I add...he wasn't active...he had a small army... no alliance... uh...hard?

Very much!!


so wait. LAVV was using farms. Thats a lie and you know it.
He had a larger army then me. I assume that that means i did well.
I'm not very active, or i would be top 100.
My alliance didn't help me.
He had the advantage on me. He had more units then me, more crystals, was located on a freakin island, and neither of us had alliance support. I won, he didn't, and i'm called a newb for it.

and i didn't use farms to help me win.

I'm proving a point here. Stop calling people newbs and play the game. You lost, stop whining


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs
PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 5:47 pm 
Corporal
Corporal
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 75
Gender: male
dont trash talk and talk abouth the battles. Lot of more interesting things happened today, like various atack to the relics, knaw swapping members, knaw, SoLD nap ended. Lot of thing to talk and you complaining for a weak conquer without aliances and farms. Make this war great.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs
PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:10 pm 
Corporal
Corporal
 Profile

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 7:58 pm
Posts: 59
deathral22 wrote:

Wait, clearly I don't know the meaning of the word lost. I thought lost meant "no longer possessed or retained" but you seem to have a different idea. Because i believe there was a battle report on his colony, and he had at least 10 squads.


Secondly, what are you whining about. All i see is OMG NEWB WE ABUSED GAMEPLAY MECHANICS AND IT BIT US IN THE BUTT AND NOW WE ARE WHINING BECAUSE YOU COUNTERED OUR GAMEPLAY MECHANICS ABUSE. YOU USED SKILL WHILE WE LACKED STRATEGY.

are you the same type of people that whine when all you make is infantry and the other guy uses concussive units. You choose a strategy to avoid losing a fight head on, that strategy had a downside, i utilized that downside, you call me an oppurtunist, when you abuse bugs? Seriously?
Your terrible, stop pretending you are good.


Yes he lost his army and left us to make room for a substitute while he rebuilt. You came here claiming to have conquered one of us but you hadn't, he had no alliance. If he was still with us you wouldn't have even tried to attack him. Zal still ranks higher than you even though you conquered him! Please post the BR, I see your rank dropped like a stone. Or shall I just get it from Zal instead?

_________________
GS "Perfect 10" Earth 5 - Era 1 - 1 Alliance - No Subs


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs
PostPosted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:19 am 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:36 pm
Posts: 351
Location: New Zealand
Gender: male
SoLD came to the party. It was short lived D:
Image
Attackers :
Army worth : 1668400 metal, 690100 oil and 9783 soldiers.
Loses : 821300 metal, 278000 oil and 5433 soldiers.
Performance : 44%

Defenders :
Army worth : 2161850 metal, 857550 oil and 13043 soldiers.
Defenders lost all units.

_________________
Image
Image
MGH - OS - SPAM - COPS - Nam - TLD - DUMB - KnaW - TTM - SoTF - KOOL - HAHA


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs
PostPosted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:51 am 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:03 am
Posts: 35
Gender: male
Nicely done knaW

_________________
ElitE*GoD$


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs
PostPosted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:41 am 
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 4:13 pm
Posts: 170
That was a nice move Knaw, we underestimated your quickness at tick change ;-)

Strangly enough, I never felt that happy before about losing my army: Finally a very boring round will become fun for SoLD. We never liked being the top dog. Much better to pull the win from behind. So, as we said before: Hope this will become a long (and fun) war!

- Xeeron


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: knaW/OilF & Subs Vs. SHEP/KOD/LAW/DIP & Subs
PostPosted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:03 pm 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:20 pm
Posts: 1275
Xeeron wrote:
That was a nice move Knaw, we underestimated your quickness at tick change ;-)

Strangly enough, I never felt that happy before about losing my army: Finally a very boring round will become fun for SoLD. We never liked being the top dog. Much better to pull the win from behind. So, as we said before: Hope this will become a long (and fun) war!

- Xeeron


Nice post. However, this won't be a long war anymore. We will deal as much damage as we possibly can before going down!

Good luck. :D

____________
Battle Reports

My lost to FEAR;
Image

Battle against a LAW member;
Image
Battle against LAW member, bad quality. :lol:
Image
Battle against a DIP member;
Image

Battle against SoLD on Relic 6.
Image

_________________
【Wins】 - 【12】
【Earth】【RoL】【RoL】【SoTF】【DoP】
【Mars】 【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【COPS】【DRAW】
【Fantasy】【EB】【Wolf】


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 152 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 16  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl