Axelol wrote:
Nokando wrote:
What's all this about S going inactive?
That's just trash, because as many S players as could be expected were extremely active
The talk of S being inactive is coming from S members and no offense FJM but I think we would know better than you would if we were inactive. We may have appeared to be active but compared to earlier in the round we were definitely inactive.
No offense taken at all, but inactivity can be for a variety of reasons - including that people in S felt they had been effectively beaten during the war of attrition across Europe, asia, africa etc where you lost your infrastructure.
I really don't want to criticise S at all, because the fight was tough and balanced so I hope my comments aren't taken the wrong way. My respect for S is genuine. One reason for DRAW's success is Tabulas' firm policy of moving less active players out to our subs - the only players allowed in DRAW were active ones. That was all part of the winning strategy. So S's downfall wasn't inactivity, it was how inactivity was dealt with.
FJM