Fellas tea time 3rd edition of battle city is out.


Sorry for the delay contrary to the popular belief i have a real life too

I very rarely comment on threads. Since my alliance (NJ) has two relics I feel as though I must at least state my position on the subject of relics. Relic placement favored the top alliance heavy. Usually it is a relic close to AA which my alliance controls. It was 3 or 4 relics close to Africa (where kca abides) and only 1 within 24 ticks of South America. NJ was fortunate to get the second relic,due to another alliance actually having the jump on us. NOPE spy attack to lock us did not work then they nearly suicided into us.

I would stop when u r ahead. Flaming in the forum or conducting yourself in poor fashion is grounds for banning. You are not helping yourself in trying to bad mouth the admin.

This is getting kinda ridiculous. It's a game guys, I don't see why we have to start some flame war against Admins for things you think may be unfair. I think Ilona and Joe have done a fine job so far and have been prompt with answering questions as well as checking out gray area rulings. I have no qualms with how they have done this era so far.

Yoz, you said that the relics were unfairly placed, however you had access to 4 of the relics. It is not the Admin's fault that you decided not to follow through and contest 3 of these relics. My alliance only had access to 2 of the relics dropped, and the CP1 relic was only after it moved for 4 ticks was it available to be hit from western Australia. The TLAV relic could've been contested by both of us. You own China and we at the time owned the Philippines.

RDH could only contest 1 relic, the one that they retrieved. KCA actually matched ETA on this relic, but backed off. It's silly to claim you couldn't have gotten that one, because you most assuredly could. RDH only matched your eta by allowing HINI to step through their territory.

I know for sure you could've contested NJ's first relic off the coast of Africa. It's no one's fault but your own that you didn't.

I'm not complaining about this though, KCA is an alliance in Africa, Europe, and Asia, so therefore they should contest at least 4 relics due to owning the middle ground. It's fine. To see you complaining on these forums about this is asinine. You even had HaHa(NOPE) contest the 5th relic which you don't have direct access to.

So you ended up with 1, maybe 2 relics in your coalition. Does this really matter? None of us have a possibility of obtaining all 10 so it's not like the game is remotely over. Just kill people for your relics and stop whining about the placement of them.

Opusteno brate

Lazar if I had as much hate for the admins as you do, I would probably quit this game and find something more enjoyable in life.

NJ take the last relic so now it is time to see the battles for the relics

Front Page Updated

OMG btw,

i said that i heared wasnot fair >> that mean possible fair possible not fair >>> that mean it can be discussed >>> that mean i pute on the table a subject, more interesting than haters postes, or no?

u guys just used agressivity on this instead make fun and do an interesting talk. surely u puted a sentences based for counter a CLAIMing. it wasnot a claim from me. i preferr talk for future not past.

that was hapened is hapened... relics release place is serously an interesting debate that can put a light not only in E6.

lol
didnt tought that will take this wrong way.

good fun... i m sure we can play this era till next year if possible.

I want a relic can i has one.


Please pretty please with sugar on top!!!

Riddler mind posting the BR on the forums so people can see the IW vs CP BR?
Nobody will want to type that link out haha.

Also very hard to understand yoz? I'm not sure his point but the fact of the matter is KCA had a big opportunity to get many relics but they were too busy fighting phiz. They could have got the one near greenland but they recalled. Only way RDH matched eta was letting 150+ squads go into NA uncontested.

EDIT: The 150+ squads were all HINI