Your logic seems flawed

To quote Milanos:
"Right.. As people might have seen I have joined RBR. I am still not able to play, but I promised I would retaliate if attacked and I have been conquered first by KCA and now by NEX, who conveniently play on the same side. So I have decided to join an alliance to try and do some damage, though that'll be hard with my activity. Which should be totally fine, but then this happens on Skype."

If he was first attacked/conquered by KCA then:

Mary and Jane are friends

I told Mary and Jane ( as-well as everyone else) not to take my cookie. I even put it in writing and I know they can both read. I told them I wouldn't like it and I will do something about it if they took my cookie.

They took my cookie anyway so now I'm going to do what I said I would do.



I could continue about a rather naughty boy with a potty mouth coming along but I think I will leave it there

95% of the people doesn't check the Biography.

So then I come to conclusion, Make a "Do not touch my cookie" warning and hide it in your pocket, and when it is snatched, then go at yell at him.

Well part of what you posted I agree with Vari, the other part, I very much disagree on. You're right about KCA being one of the few that came completely prepared for anything this era. For that, you all have my respect. I heard of MANY disbandment's of teams before this era started and many teams never even showed up (unless they are hiding). I fully understand the commitment it takes to plan an era even just a month or so in advance and have people stick through, let alone 6 months to a year in advance. KCA covered their butts to the best of their ability preparing for the worst of competition against them. Very smart move by KCA. HOWEVER, that being said, when a majority of the expected competition failed to show up, THAT is where most of these arguments are coming from. Now, KCA is a huge coalition with seemingly very little competition to stand up to them. I've seen MANY people who were only around to watch the CE step up because they simply don't want to see the CE be sullied in name. A championship era should be won by clawing and scratching the entire way until you reach the top. That is why it is unlimited ticks until all 10 relics are captured. Truthfully, I agree with this mentality. It was my mentality last CE, and it remains the same this CE. Whomever wins will damn well deserve it. That is why I troll top alliances when they are at war.

So as for the quote:


I have to VERY much disagree with you. KCA deserves a standing ovation for keeping themselves organized, yes, but deserve the win? Absolutely not. No one deserves it until they win it. Whether it be through betrayals (I hope not, but eh, if it happens, it happens), brute force, diplomacy, or maybe KCA's overwhelming tactics will indeed work this era as well. But when you come with a large coalition or lots of subs, you MUST expect the backlash that's associated with it. It has and always will be this way. Almost everyone has been a part of a coalition or sub empire at one point. And yes, it does help win eras. But just because someone has done it in the past does not mean they have to like it. I played with many in KCA just last era in M1 and I enjoyed my time with them greatly in winning that era, but I was also extremely sad at the fact that we had 5+ subs. Especially when we didn't need a single one of them to win (though, they were a great help I will admit). I am a previous sub empire leader (though, the most I ever had under me was 3 subs) and I've been the lead in multiple coalitions. So I'm not going to sit here and say anyone who uses these tactics are any less of a player. BUT I will say anyone who uses these tactics should face the facts that there is always backlash. I had to disband some of my subs in order to keep my allies from wanting to kill me for sub abuse. My enemies called upon all their friends to build and impede my coalitions.

Best of luck to KCA. If they come out on top, I will be the first to applaud. I have many friends in KCA, but my goal is to prolong the CE era, regardless of who is on top. Friend or foe will both meet my units in trolling them. I said this last CE a year ago and my mindset has not changed one bit.




Truthfully Yoz, I don't blame Milan at all for posting that skype conversation. The conversation itself has no valuable information about either side. There is no breach in trust. Milan is simply showing that NO respect was shown to him by Niko. He was berated by a player for playing BattleDawn. Threatened in fact. Is no player allowed to fight Rania without a threat of being hunted down every era he plays by 30+ players? Simply because Milan made a statement that he would troll whomever attacked him?

I can also play the threat game and I can also follow through with it as well. I can say that any world SRB attends to, I will show up and troll them with any and all of the friends that I can gather. You cannot break a trolls moral as the more you pay attention to him, the more satisfied he (or she) is. Now, I'm not actually going to do this (unless truly provoked), but this is more or less, how petty of a hissy fit that message truly was. Friends will fight against one another eventually. It's the only way to keep BD interesting. The more you play, the more people you get to know and truthfully, we all want a challenge. I hope that any friend I face will respect me as I will do so with him (or her) as well. If they can't show me that simple courtesy, then I think it's pretty simple. They were no true friend of mine.


And Alone - You're right, not many read bios, but just because you didn't read something doesn't mean it wasn't there. You cannot blame a man for sticking to his convictions just because you didn't know what they were.

Gosh!!
Didnt login for 2 days & from pg 18 to to pg 24 with long posts
Well should i read from pg 18 hmmm...... HELL NO!

Here's the quick condensed version for those just tuning in.
rambler 1: Rania's too powerful
rambler 2: no she ain't!
rambler 3: Rania sucks!
rambler 4: You suck!
rambler 1: wtf people?!
rambler 3: rambler 1 sucks!
onlookers: wtf is going on here?
rambler 3: i want a cookie!
rambler 4: You still suck!

That help?

@Alone1

Your flogging a dead argument

Ok lets try to follow your logical argument:

1) They see Senatus col
2) They see his medals because he didn't hide them
3) They know who he is because some of them actually know him and all "pros" have at least heard of him
4) They decide to conquer him and need to see if he has built any squads so they click on his col to give them options
5) They click on his profile to see if he has built any squads
6) They see everything he has typed (because you have no choice when you want to move onto view the Statistics)
7) They DON'T read what he has typed because what? its only Senatus of Kong?
8) They then check if he has built any squads and launch their attack.

And with all the Broadcasts that were made regarding him?

Yeh right, they just probably didn't read his profile

@ josh i meant if they win then they fully deserve it.

I can agree with that. But whomever wins the era should deserve it. All is fair in love and war. With that being the case though, I can still hate some of the ways used to win

Or just the fact that the KCA member in question BCed that he was attacking him and the nex member not only BCed it, but also posted it in the forums and stuff. They knew what was gonna happen.

To all the pros , you didn't dare play this CE and shouting from a corner like a chicken won't give you anything. The right goes to those who are on CE and are fighting. And as for senatas : why don't we conquer you. You're just a castle to gain 1 power and increase income. And malice wolf you didn't play this CE so stop complaining about strategy and stuff.
And as for other people put some fuel in the fire but stay on your limit and kindly don't post Skype chat to show you knew everything from start and have connections.


& Everything's fair in LoVe and WaR