Play Free War Battle Games Online, Multiplayer Games, Strategy Games, Top MMORPG

HTFU · **Joined:** Fri Nov 29, 2013 6:19 am **Posts:** 3

This sucks.
For those who boost less will not get anything.

Only boosteres will win.

dsdati · **Joined:** Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:44 am **Posts:** 2

i disagree, because 2nd and third places make it possible for non boosting players to play bd and achieve success. NO REWARD FOR 3RD PLACE --> BD BECOMES ONE OF THOSE thousands of GAMES THAT NEED YOU TO PAY TO EVER WIN.

rohanshu1234 · **Joined:** Thu Dec 27, 2012 12:19 pm **Posts:** 20

i disagree.... the members of the top alliance are usually (not always) red boosters. the 2nd n 3rd place is the only resort for gud players who r non-boosters to gain large amounts of tokens. hence this new suggestion shouldn't be brought in effect.

1234532423 · **Posted:** Tue Jan 28, 2014 5:55 am

The New Rule of giving no Tokens for Top: 2 and 3 Alliance isn't Good at all. Players might even Stop Playing BG!! - Not Good

Tiyzer · **Joined:** Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:10 am **Posts:** 12

This could all be settled if battle dawn was to introduce new eras.
These era can be executed in many different ways such as;

1. A 'non' boosting era, a era where there is no boosting allowed, but the prizes you receive for winning is not as much as a normal era. for obvious reasons.. If a player is paying for reds they should always be in the position for a bigger reward that those that who are not paying.. But this still gives these players to get a taste for the game and how it works and progress in it, which can then lead to them playing outside of the 'non' boosting eras.. But you could also have a cap on how many times you can play or win the era.. lets say 2 wins and then you have out qualified that era and shouldn't be able to play anymore.. but that's just a thought..

2. Another possibility that should be considered is a era on each world. e.g. earth,mars,fantasy where they don't just pay out blues. but the payout is switched to reds instead. There is many problems with the players not being given an incentive to boost and play because in the long run they don't receive anything of much value to them, But by introducing a re-occurring era where the pay out is reds and not blues this could potentially boost competition and the players wanting to strive to winning a red token era..
So the players could go through lets say steps..

First step as they would join the game they would be able to participate in the 'non' boosting era, to get a real taste of how the game works and progress as a player if they have an interest in it..

Second step is after they have won a few eras of this 'non' boosting era they have gained a real interest in the game and want to progress even further as a player so they will sign up for the normal eras and so on and so fourth.. after all these steps there last step would be playing in the main red eras to try and win this with all the small prizes they have received through out there progression in bd.

I've only touched lightly on this subject i know..
But i think investing in new eras should really be considered for the progression of this game..

TOOLAD · **Posted:** Tue Jan 28, 2014 6:32 am

haha i actually have rethought this whole thing after reading the other posts, and now i completely agree with it. i ve benn back for like 1 month and so far it sucks lol hopefully this can make stuff interesting again. i tell what though , it is going to be a lot more thrilling to be the rank one alaince always watching ur "allies". haha great update admins!

princekael2 · **Joined:** Sat Mar 26, 2011 4:32 pm **Posts:** 238

Silentden007 wrote:

princekael2 wrote:

wreckages, UFOs, achievments, voting. all 4 of these are reliable ways of getting tokens, if you are active enough throughout an era, you will have enough tokens saved up for another era EASILY. i only boost about 600 blues on an average era, although i can boost reds, i most often choose not to, its not NEEDED its helpful, and only that.

You must have glanced over the text instead of reading it.

And calling ufo's, wreckages and achievement reliable ways of getting tokens is ridiculous. UFO's and wreckages don't ALWAYS give out blues. and the amount you get from UFO's is negligible.

Achievements are a 1 time thing. Or should I use a new account every other era, because medals are overrated right?

Sure, reduced tokens we get from voting means I only have to vote for BD like what, 2-3 weeks before I have a decent supply of blues? I will just play a era every month or so then!

That's the most common mindset BD players have (if they actually have the patience to vote everyday or even stick around). Yes, you are totally awesome and can win with only 600 blues. But if everyone could do that, there would have been no battlehugs in the first place now would there

and if you actually bothered to research what the greatest income for players that typically win a lot is, you would see what i mean.

mustafa960 · **Joined:** Mon May 02, 2011 11:23 am **Posts:** 461

Is this for just CE ,or all eras?

I will assume it's for all worlds , firstly this idea would definitely make Battle dawn , much more competitive as there are no more "battle-hugs" and players will play only to win. However , it would mean the majority of players who are experienced and usually settle for second - like me , are those that can't spend reds lavishly due to the fact i'm in school. Also , those who finish second and third will have to either spend ages voting and creating a token pool to play an era , where red boosters will most likely dominate due to the fact they have a large head start , and lastly diplomacy will no longer exist.

kozak2014 · **Joined:** Wed Jan 01, 2014 7:21 pm **Posts:** 1

Korupt wrote:

I completely agree with only first place getting tokens.

i dont agree. this will make BD playing only by you and 20 more boosters .
but ok, aply this and kill this game finaly:)

georgeshelou · **Posted:** Tue Jan 28, 2014 7:55 am

I totally agree with the idea of not rewarding tokens for the second and third alliance for the reasons above, it will encourage fighting and stop battle hugs.

No tokens for 2nd and 3rd alliance!