Author |
Message |
TTTT09
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:31 pm |
|
Private 1st class |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 6:58 am Posts: 12
|
cosmin1980 wrote: One more thing: respect to Edi and Sold for keeping their word and staying neutral. They have power, 2 relics, I am sure everyone in Sage is begging them for help. And yet they keep the word given to their friends at era start. That is a true BD warrior. Hat off to you Haha why thank you cosmin 
|
|
Top |
|
agonasani
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:48 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:35 pm Posts: 614 Location: FYRO Macedonia Gender: male
|
any major BRs
_________________

BMO chop(If this was a real attack you'd be dead)
|
|
Top |
|
eragona
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 1:35 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 7:30 am Posts: 299 Gender: male
|
vishesh1999 wrote: please dont double post, just edit your previous post
btw on your comment, VND didnt fought 15 alliances, they were just like scavengers(except CBOP)
all their so called *allies* did the dirty work for them, in case of GML, (LOST,haha, beer) incase of CBOP (hu)
and war with SAGE has just started so please think be4 u post So u wernt paying attension to the world and the Battles that happened ??. If u dont know , just ask others, they will let u know. Or there are a few threads that have a lot of BRs, go look into it. So Plz think be4 u post.
_________________ Zodiac War does not determine who is right,only who is left.
Currently playing E6- HaHa
|
|
Top |
|
lifenstuff
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 2:07 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:55 pm Posts: 1544 Gender: male
|
aister wrote: lifenstuff wrote: i think the numbers play a HUGE role in this, at least more than they are given credit for. i mean just for "I" 4 alliances are mentioned going against them.
and 2-4+? alliances are mentioned going against SAGE and the subs.
This is not to say, i think it's unfair because this is essentially how the game is played. But yea stuff I has I, EVIL and II, they have subs too and don't forget it was I who started the attack first, knowing fully that they are going against such number. So if they lost, u can't blame it on anything.
_________________

Apollo wrote: Eh, I try to win every once and awhile. Gotta keep up appearances.
|
|
Top |
|
Milanos
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 2:28 pm |
|
Moderator |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:13 pm Posts: 2041
|
lifenstuff wrote: i think the numbers play a HUGE role in this, at least more than they are given credit for. i mean just for "I" 4 alliances are mentioned going against them.
and 2-4+? alliances are mentioned going against SAGE and the subs.
This is not to say, i think it's unfair because this is essentially how the game is played. But yea stuff Well, SAGE has SUB, SOTF and RAWR fighting with them.. We have in Asia effectively half of LOST, some of TFM and HINI with us. I'm quite some that if you do the maths they overpower us by quite a bit. Quote: please dont double post, just edit your previous post
btw on your comment, VND didnt fought 15 alliances, they were just like scavengers(except CBOP)
all their so called *allies* did the dirty work for them, in case of GML, (LOST,haha, beer) incase of CBOP (hu)
and war with SAGE has just started so please think be4 u post You better be kidding. In case of CBop, it was us that did the fights, us that did the chasing, us that locked them on one occasion, us that went for their colonies. It's not as if we tried to have HU kill them so we could conserve troops. HU was useful, but they were sadly not coordinated enough to actually take down CBop. Then as for the GML war.. We stepped in, and only a few dozen ticks in killed 120 squads ourselves. Then we moved, together with BEER/LOST/IND/HAHA down into South America, where again we ourselves sent at a colony and HAHA sent at the other. Then we as VND flew into Antarctica, with 12 members sending end of tick, and went east to clear up ourselves while HAHA went west to go for the colonies. We killed quite some units there, you can check the BRs I posted as I kept every thread updated quite nicely. Then shortly after relics were released, we went for two relics, and got into war with I and SAGE (and subs). True, TFM scored the major kill of 200 squads, but as most would tell you, I was rather annoyed that SAGE didn't turn and fly into us  Now we are hunting through upper Asia with no other allies there, fighting SAGE + SOTF + RAWR + SUB there. So please, think before you post. We have brilliant allies, I will in no way deny it. They are an awesome force, I trust them fully and they are great alliances. But that does not mean that we as VND just sat back and let them do the work.. You don't get 30k kills just from sitting back.
_________________ Won both Championship Eras as rank 1.. Waiting to make it 3 out of 3.
|
|
Top |
|
agonasani
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 2:36 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:35 pm Posts: 614 Location: FYRO Macedonia Gender: male
|
i wish i could take part in these battles
_________________

BMO chop(If this was a real attack you'd be dead)
|
|
Top |
|
mfreak
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 2:44 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:21 am Posts: 2755 Location: Chicago, Illinois Gender: male
|
Quote: all their so called *allies* did the dirty work for them, in case of GML, (LOST,haha, beer) incase of CBOP (hu) Like Milan said, we killed 120 Squads of GML, around 200 or 220 squads of Cbop, Many other armies here and there for which you can find BRs in this very thread. That is why you will find every VND member with around 12k kills on an average. And we have been fighting from the word go, from tick 1. Sitting back and letting others do the job for us wouldnt have fetched us those statistics, so am not sure what you are goin on about. As for the SAGE trap, well, we couldnt get ALL of our units down there, so we got TFM to help trap SAGE. SAGE decided to go through with the battle. And lastly, this era has seen some of the biggest, most active coalitions ever. HAHA, IND, LOST, BEER, SEXY, TROL, HINI, TFM etc have done a great job. But that is the situation on the server today. Its a server with some of the biggest coalitions: SAGE, SOTF, SUB, RAWR, I, II, EVIL etc., GML, GMLX, GMLA etc etc., We are just playing the game according to what has been laid out in front of us. Our allies coordinate very well with us, are active and they kick some serious ass. Dont blame us or try to discredit us for it!
_________________ Deadman - SYN ----------------
|
|
Top |
|
Zarule6
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:41 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:38 am Posts: 11
|
vishesh1999 wrote: please dont double post, just edit your previous post
btw on your comment, VND didnt fought 15 alliances, they were just like scavengers(except CBOP)
all their so called *allies* did the dirty work for them, in case of GML, (LOST,haha, beer) incase of CBOP (hu)
and war with SAGE has just started so please think be4 u post what milan said^ + Isn't I exactly that ?, abandoning there's subs squads in NA and running away like crying babies ? Letting your subs take the punch and do the heavy work for yeh,in about 86 ticks I got pushed back from NA and now your running away from Greenland as well. SAGE lost 200+ squads in the second day of the war,flying with a long eta ? omg a person would at least expect them too not make that dumb a move. You guys backstabbed knowing full well who you where going up against + you had the upper hand in terms that most of VND/HaHa/BEER's armies where in AA fighting GML. And I don't think Milan has too think about anything,SAGE lost 600 power in 34 ticks,I personally think you should go rethink what you just said and also get a better overview of what's happening as you seem close too clueless. btw I take it you guys are securing your hive again ?
|
|
Top |
|
lifenstuff
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:52 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:55 pm Posts: 1544 Gender: male
|
mfreak wrote: Quote: all their so called *allies* did the dirty work for them, in case of GML, (LOST,haha, beer) incase of CBOP (hu) We are just playing the game according to what has been laid out in front of us. ! You can't really use that since you had your subs organized before the era.
_________________

Apollo wrote: Eh, I try to win every once and awhile. Gotta keep up appearances.
|
|
Top |
|
aister
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:59 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:48 am Posts: 7985 Location: Fuyuki City Gender: male
|
can't deny VND has lots of subs, or "brother alliances" as they said. However, VND did take a major part in most of their wars. HU became useless after tick 50~70, and VND had to do it all themselves. HaHa and BEER couldn't push GML much, idk if it's intentional or not, but only after VND joined did they win the war. VND was also part of the trap that killed SAGE.
the only thing that disappointed me is the amount of alliances going for the win in this era. We only have CBop, VND, SAGE, GML (that is worth mentioning). And while CBop is still going, I don't know if they can go against VND again anymore. GML is pretty much dead and SAGE is losing...
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|

|