Author |
Message |
ConqueringMenstrual
|
Post subject: Re: E4 age 18! Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:44 am |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 9:59 am Posts: 134
|
lol
_________________
 FMJ, LD, POKE, GoT, HAHA Lead: AxT, EoR, MM & CME
Last edited by ConqueringMenstrual on Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Day of Darkness
|
Post subject: Re: E4 age 18! Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:45 am |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 7:29 pm Posts: 1728 Gender: male
|
indala wrote: what ARM has to do here? I played in an alliance who backsbbed ARM? nvm
Did I bring here when Milan backstabbed ur alliance and days of darkness, Matt, and you made a looooong thread crying?
Naps, friendship, word in my book, has to be respected, i do know is a game, and s*it happens, but u never wait the knife from people u know well on ur doorstep. MASSIVE difference between backstabbing another alliance and backstabbing your own alliance. That should be obvious. Day of Darkness
_________________ XOXO, Sky, Meow, COPS, CRAP, RAWR, SAGA, RoL, GS, XI, UTM, AoD, ECHO, TSK, Cbop. Former Admin. Miss this game.
RIP Mo.

 Thanks Kenny.
|
|
Top |
|
mfreak
|
Post subject: Re: E4 age 18! Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:56 am |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:21 am Posts: 2755 Location: Chicago, Illinois Gender: male
|
Quote: what ARM has to do here? I played in an alliance who backsbbed ARM? nvm Yeah? I didnt see all this "honor" talk back then is all am saying. Quote: Did I bring here when Milan backstabbed ur alliance and days of darkness, Matt, and you made a looooong thread crying? He backstabbed his own alliance. Thats totally different from breaking NAPs. Quote: Naps, friendship, word in my book, has to be respected, i do know is a game, and s*it happens, but u never wait the knife from people u know well on ur doorstep. Well when these same people that you know well a) Demand too much and get pissed that we take conquers, crystals and resource outposts. b) Piss in your cornflakes and make every alliance you attack their subs c) Match ETA with you with the INTENT of killing your squads (see previous pics) d) Use cocky language to demand stuff from you then in that case they arent really treating you as friends. Why would you expect us to treat you any differently? Point is you want to win as much as we do. Hence why we see more explosive units in your squads. And you did have a plan to backstab later on, just that we jumped the gun before you. No biggie.
_________________ Deadman - SYN ----------------
|
|
Top |
|
Botelharareborn
|
Post subject: Re: E4 age 18! Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:53 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:27 am Posts: 80 Gender: male
|
mfreak wrote: Quote: what ARM has to do here? I played in an alliance who backsbbed ARM? nvm Yeah? I didnt see all this "honor" talk back then is all am saying. Quote: Did I bring here when Milan backstabbed ur alliance and days of darkness, Matt, and you made a looooong thread crying? He backstabbed his own alliance. Thats totally different from breaking NAPs. Quote: Naps, friendship, word in my book, has to be respected, i do know is a game, and s*it happens, but u never wait the knife from people u know well on ur doorstep. Well when these same people that you know well a) Demand too much and get pissed that we take conquers, crystals and resource outposts. b) Piss in your cornflakes and make every alliance you attack their subs c) Match ETA with you with the INTENT of killing your squads (see previous pics) d) Use cocky language to demand stuff from you then in that case they arent really treating you as friends. Why would you expect us to treat you any differently? Point is you want to win as much as we do. Hence why we see more explosive units in your squads. And you did have a plan to backstab later on, just that we jumped the gun before you. No biggie. shut up... here is the full BR fellows http://www.imagetolink.com/i/3fee7ba29d ... 5263c71d9f
|
|
Top |
|
RadonX
|
Post subject: Re: E4 age 18! Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:15 am |
|
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 12:26 pm Posts: 13
|
And about back-stab, yes we did back-stab. But in one way or other UN was the one that back-stabbed earlier. U know why? We fought TA and PHX from tick 200 or so. When TA and PHX lost and got weakened they relocated to australia as UN gave them asylum there and UN taking some OPs of TA. Then both alliances PHX and TA merged to form UA and UB. Again after that POTC and HaHa fought UA and UB and were pushing them off to eastof AA. *Bang* -> UA and UB were declared as UN subs...WTF? And all the attacks on them were to be stopped? ^ this is what era long allies were meant to do?? Taking our enemy and preparing to strike us with whole world of their subs? (oh yea some 18-20 subs) And it was after all these nonsense from UN we decided to go war. Win or lose. Lets have some fun guyz 
_________________ Zodiac War does not determine who is right,only who is left.
Last edited by RadonX on Tue Feb 26, 2013 7:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
mfreak
|
Post subject: Re: E4 age 18! Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:33 am |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:21 am Posts: 2755 Location: Chicago, Illinois Gender: male
|
Quote: shut up... Yeah take your own advice instead of making a lot of unnecessary noise.
_________________ Deadman - SYN ----------------
|
|
Top |
|
Botelharareborn
|
Post subject: Re: E4 age 18! Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:53 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:27 am Posts: 80 Gender: male
|
mfreak wrote: Quote: shut up... Yeah take your own advice instead of making a lot of unnecessary noise. ok backstabber  vaite foder amigo
|
|
Top |
|
malicewolf
|
Post subject: Re: E4 age 18! Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:54 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 11:02 pm Posts: 1607
|
Well, I've been quite for most of this talk. I've always been one who's against backstabbing, but I do have to agree; UN was looking for a war here. If not, then they are the sh#^est allies in the world. Purposeful sniping with intent to kill. It was constant "oh, that pro player is offline right now, and it just so happens he is conveniently about to kill BYZ units with a perfect anti BYZ squad incoming. Oh and if he doesn't get online in time, that OP is ours".
Add in the demand for us to back down on our enemies (remember PHX?) and then make them into a sub. When TA/PHX merged into UA/UB, they asked for a ceasefire and we gave it to them. Only to be back-stabbed then and have nearly 200 BYZ units killed off. And conveniently, when we went to get UA/UB after this fiasco, UN calls them a sub? But of course, this isn't considered a betrayal.
UN can claim they wanted peace all they want, but they've been pushing for us to war for a while now. Not to mention, who the hell are we supposed to war with? There's only 8 alliances that AREN'T a UN sub within the top 20. And to top it off, we're allied with just about all that aren't. Any enemy we did have, UN took in as one of their own.
So, what does this leave us? 1. Allies that are constantly trying to kill us 2. No enemies to fight 3. Constant demands from our ally (notice I said demands, not requests)
I'll go ahead and say that it was a back-stab from BYZ. But I would hardly call it uncalled for.
_________________
 Gettin' real tired of your shi...
|
|
Top |
|
aviturg
|
Post subject: Re: E4 age 18! Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:39 am |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:09 am Posts: 196 Gender: male
|
the really funny thing here, is that for the 6+ years that i am here, people don't learn... it is the same every era.
this is why i hate NAPs. they hold as long as both parties have no interest in attacking each other, but then what do i need a NAP for? once the interest in a NAP is over for one of the sides, they will break it, and then they will get excuses out of their as#!es to justify their move.
NAP is nothing... all you have is trust between real friends which obviously wasn't the case here. in E1A3 (old client), we (BUL5) fought along with another alliance (CRH), we became real friends and trusted each other completely. that was a full round true friendship that held even when our main wanted to attack them for the winning. We gave up #1 for them and settled for #2 because we wouldn't fight them (although we were much stronger). oh, and did i forget to mention... we never had a formal pact of any kind.
NAPs are nothing. think about it the next time you sign one.
cheers
_________________ BUL5 - LoM - UBL - F69 - XI
psg188 wrote: There are a few lessons to learn here: #5 Don't fight Avi
|
|
Top |
|
cosmin1980
|
Post subject: Re: E4 age 18! Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:42 am |
|
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:49 am Posts: 231
|
Guys, As usual Avi is wrong. NAPs are great. Best thing is to make a NAP, then 2 ticks later lock and attack the other alliance and kill them all. Especially if they are led by a wuss who doesn't like NAPs. That will teach them a lesson. So I am all for NAPs as long as I break them first 
_________________ Daemon of Zamorre KoH, MGH, LWB, NWL, KoTu Best rank:1 Most crystals: 1067 Veni vidi vici
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|

|