just for the lulz, this is a message from harm i got, its like all of his messages to me


he still doesnt know who i am so how is he gonna tell me BD friends?

If you knew HARM, you would know he loves to do sent those messages and join BC wars

Also, since you guys love messages so much, heres a message showing wolowitz incompetence



Makes a nap with us, keeps us marked hostile and doesnt inform his members of the nap, hes either a failure as a leader or a backstabber from heart

although i love harm's mesasges, there isnt one where he calls me a noob or a backstabber

cant wait for the big battles to go down

Your posts and the messages we've gotten from you guys are almost impossible to reply to. I don't mean that in a good way.

My point was you have no right to call us backstabbers (which equates to bad people in my head), when you're sitting around doing that.

And you should really fix up those inconsistencies. You say you're not playing seriously but I get this



What non serious alliance wars at tick one and continues it throughout the era? What non serious alliance gets into a 50 squad vs 60 squad battle? What non serious alliance stays up until 12 and moves 20 squads to an op someone else is attacking?




TL;DR - Non serious alliance thing is *CENSORED* and so is probably everything else they say.




1. I had you marked friendly actually.

2. We were allies with BDAA first. A NAP means nothing in that situation. I've explained it to 3 different members.

3. My incompetence? How about's Michael's incompetence. He failed to tell me about the war between you and BDAA, and hmm... anything else. In the short 5 messages we gave each other I gave him more info and cooperated more efficiently than he did.




And to show that the claim is true -



@Tick number.


As far as I'm concerned, if you're at war with an ally then any NAP's or agreements we have are void. If that's backstabbing, then I backstabbed.

There. Now that's my last post.

the last 2 messages are... wtf those dont make sense lol

>.< That was supposed to be my last post Omega lol


Second to last one can be interpreted either way I guess. I meant that we've been allied to BDAA all era, but we made a NAP with HaHa at tick 50. I value the former more, so therefore we're at war with HaHa.

And the last message was just to validate my claim about the NAP somewhat.

Lag post.

"What non serious alliance wars at tick one and continues it throughout the era? What non serious alliance gets into a 50 squad vs 60 squad battle? What non serious alliance stays up until 12 and moves 20 squads to an op someone else is attacking?"

You think a non serious alliance is an alliance that doesnt do anything but build? if so your dumber then i thought.
We are all players that are active on other servers, of course we can be active here

Only me and bigband were here at tick 1 rest build around tick 20 when i asked.

YOU failed to inform us about being allied to BDAA, we dont need to give you any info on our wars. Its backstabb none the less.
Your a vulture, deal with it.

Also,




If your gonna lie, do it properly.

If you think nothing could have happened between tick 50 and tick 119, then you're dumber than I thought.

I know I said last post but sometimes it's just too funny.

Ok. Last post officially now. Super cereal this time.

I dont even see how that applies here when you never told your members anything about a nap.

You called baratong a newb, yet he sent a nuke 13eta and it killed some of your units, i wonder whos the real newb here lol

Stop talking so much and do something already big boy.