No, the shots all happen at the same time so if each unit deals 1 damage and has 1 health for example then the 600 unit force will deal 600 damage int he first round to 300 force and the 300 force deals 300 damage to the 600 force. This happens at the exact same time. So the 600 unit force deals more damage however a bunch of it is wasted due to them not needing the extra damage.

Like I said this is why you use armored units. Due to their higher health then damage dealt they actually make the numbers of the units count. Which is why if you have a squad of 10 armor and 20 ranged v 2 squads of 30 ranged they deal devastating losses even though they dont win.

Nothings been suggested. If you suggest something you need a concrete example of HOW it needs to be changed. If you want it to be changed an alternative must be presented.

Now I couldn't find the exact list of things that you aren't supposed to vote to change because I think they removed them when they changed the community suggestion board but combat system was one of the things that we had on the list of not being able to propose.

The way combat is set at right now makes perfect sense.

agree, if he doesn't make clear if he's suggesting something, this should be in newbie or veteran questions...

think real life. 2v1 gunfight. the two both shoot but its a waste since it only takes one shot to kill the 1 guy. the one guy shoots and kills one of the two. This isn't entirely accurate but in BD you don't miss or shoot faster

Well you do shoot faster, hats what the Range is.

This whole thing im basicly suggesting that there is an over-welming thing.... where if you have more units.... you have a small advantage and wont loose as much

But its not a question... put it in the right spot

Lmao, they do have an advantage, they deal more damage and have more health collectively. If you throw pro squads into the mix it will be much more apparant their advantage.

Ya I agree its not a question. Is there a "total Newb" thread?