One thing I dont understand... well not understand... but dont get why its like this...

Attackers : 60 anti inf range
Defenders: 50 anti inf range

The attacks win... but with 50 losses... so... Shouldent there be less losses for the attacks??? Since they had more units

^_^


-Moved to Newbie Questions-
~Golden

Depending on XP and the health, it could change to them losing.

Well because there were 50 defenders and they all have a certain attack points and HP. There shouldn't be less because you had almost equal amount of units attacking no doubt your going to take heavy losses.

How about this

Defenders: 300 anti inf range (inf.)
Attackers: 600 anti inf range (inf.)



Thats a 300 soilder advantage.... but yet.... they still lose 300 units.

Do they? How did you find your answers out? Did you put it in the battle sim?

yups

well its because they have the same attack points and HP and they both attack first if you mixed with armor Im sure that you would have a different result.

makes perfect sense. 1 range infantry kills 1 range infantry in one hit.

This is in the wrong forum but bascally what happens in combat is all of the ranged units do damage at the exact same time. So if you have 50 infantry v 60 then the losses will be 50 and 50. This is why most players mix armor in with their squads as the damage is dealt to armored units first. So they serve as a meat shield for the more expensive ranged units.

im talking about over-welming....


if there is 600 snipers vs. 300

te 600 will get alot more shots in... so you would think they would have less losses