| Author |
Message |
|
ttotheoma
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub  Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:28 am |
|
| Sergeant |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 2:08 pm
Posts: 133
Location: Gibbons
Gender: male
|
|
no LC we were using mechs but switched to inf cause they were using VEH it was a good plan but they switched to veh afteer we mass produced beam inf and that is what we ended with for anti mechs
_________________
toma
|
|
| Top |
|
|
EosAStar
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:32 am |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 79
|
|
Nice fight. Yeah but you guys missed the fact that those vehicles were those of us that were in CE that attacked with NAM when you first came across.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
generated-XiIYQ6ZCyWi9-1518551659
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:34 am |
|
| Private |
 |
|
|
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2018 2:54 pm
Posts: 0
Gender: male
|
It was a good fight  The era isnt over yet though!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
ttotheoma
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:38 am |
|
| Sergeant |
|
|
|
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 2:08 pm
Posts: 133
Location: Gibbons
Gender: male
|
|
i knw its not just saying good work to u guys. we made a mistake in unit build or else i think we may have either won or done alot more dmg
_________________
toma
|
|
| Top |
|
|
FlexLex24
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 2:10 am |
|
| Private |
|
|
|
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 12:38 am
Posts: 9
|
|
Damn.... whats the EXP looking like on those ranged tanks>?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
ttotheoma
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 2:16 am |
|
| Sergeant |
|
|
|
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 2:08 pm
Posts: 133
Location: Gibbons
Gender: male
|
|
man im guessing the xp isnt going to be too much but it will be decent
_________________
toma
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Dylan102
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 3:11 am |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:36 pm
Posts: 351
Location: New Zealand
Gender: male
|
|
whooooo I only lost 4 ranged units.
_________________
MGH - OS - SPAM - COPS - Nam - TLD - DUMB - KnaW - TTM - SoTF - KOOL - HAHA
|
|
| Top |
|
|
TheCallum
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 4:24 am |
|
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:59 pm
Posts: 32
Gender: male
|
lilconqueror wrote: ttotheoma wrote: ya good battle u deserve the win in the end getting all your members there to the fight and all the anti mechs. we kinda mass produced inf beam cause we figured thats what u were but in the end u showed us.(ps going into this fight we figured we would lose) try sticking with 1 and only 1 unit type........ Sticking with one unit type isn't always solid. We switched to tanks at some point, when we realised our inf would get crushed by IRON's tanks. Lucky for us that even decided to go beam inf! But good game IRON, I'm glad that you're graceful in defeat bros.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
The Assassin
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 5:47 am |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 2:09 pm
Posts: 57
Gender: male
|
|
Ow... that considerably stung.
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
|
CodeoftheSith
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 10:57 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 4:06 pm
Posts: 670
|
|
well... i can't say im surprised by the BR... i lead Nam's sub on e2 a few eras back, they didn't win, but they took down the rank 1 alliance, while being rank 8 themselves. and they didn't have any real help in the war either.
Either way, great fight on both sides, and all i really have to say about it is, GEE-ZUS Nam, you got a lot of ranged explosive tanks....
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
