Author |
Message |
langy79
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:53 pm |
|
Private 1st class |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:08 pm Posts: 10
|
Langy that is classified as spam as it is only one word that doesnt contribute anything to the topic.. in other news... We killed almost the whole sub now, here's a BR from last night =] Im sure the fellow members on the BD Maintenance will let this slip just the once 
|
|
Top |
|
Dylan102
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 8:46 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:36 pm Posts: 351 Location: New Zealand Gender: male
|
CodeoftheSith wrote: Dylan102 wrote: Langy that is classified as spam as it is only one word that doesnt contribute anything to the topic.. oh, lighten up gollum. no need to jump on his case over a simple post. is it hurting you? or your ships? i doubt it. haha I wasnt even be serious.. Man jump to conclusions much 
_________________

 MGH - OS - SPAM - COPS - Nam - TLD - DUMB - KnaW - TTM - SoTF - KOOL - HAHA
|
|
Top |
|
langy79
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 8:53 pm |
|
Private 1st class |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:08 pm Posts: 10
|
Dylan102 wrote: CodeoftheSith wrote: Dylan102 wrote: Langy that is classified as spam as it is only one word that doesnt contribute anything to the topic.. oh, lighten up gollum. no need to jump on his case over a simple post. is it hurting you? or your ships? i doubt it. haha I wasnt even be serious.. Man jump to conclusions much  Dylan u know i love you so lighten up a little.. oh i nearly forgot LOL 
|
|
Top |
|
Stoned2Assassin
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 11:12 pm |
|
Specialist |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 7:36 pm Posts: 28 Location: My computer Gender: male
|
|
Top |
|
FlexLex24
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 12:54 am |
|
Private |
 |
|
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 12:38 am Posts: 9
|
I cant talk any crap on NAM so far because they havent done anything "wrong" in my opinion, but CE on the other hand has struck a nerve with me
I was a member of UEF. We had two subs. Our leader left for a few days to visit family and didnt have internet, and he also happens to be Korean. For some reason, my guess bad communication and confusion, one of our subs happened to make an attack on CE. No damage done, in fact as much as we can tell there is no proof of even an attack taking place.
The retaliation for such a small attack (no crystals taken, no colonies conquered) was absurd and imo rivals some of the biggest back stabs ive ever seen... They conquered EVERY member of our sub, took every OP, killed every unit. Mind you this is a group of noobs just learning the game, barely any power, etc. They do ALL this without even contacting a member from our main first.
Furthermore when we consult them immediately finding out they ignore us, blow us off, etc, and continue conuering our sub members. We stand idly by since our leader is on vaca, and dont defend these guys. Leader of CE has to be the biggest piece of *CENSORED* ive talked to on BD, so cocky, especially considering hes probably a pimply 14 year old who just got back from fat camp.
Pick on someone your own size, stop hiding behind NAM, and maybe youll gain respect in the game
Oh, and less *CENSORED*, more battlereports please. Looking forward to seeing this one in Greenland, and please, stop blocking out the units. You look like self conscious teenage girls when you do it. Your enemies have already seen the report-they were in it
|
|
Top |
|
generated-XiIYQ6ZCyWi9-1518551659
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:10 am |
|
Private |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2018 2:54 pm Posts: 0 Gender: male
|
|
Top |
|
ttotheoma
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:16 am |
|
Sergeant |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 2:08 pm Posts: 133 Location: Gibbons Gender: male
|
|
Top |
|
generated-XiIYQ6ZCyWi9-1518551659
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:20 am |
|
Private |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2018 2:54 pm Posts: 0 Gender: male
|
|
Top |
|
ttotheoma
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:25 am |
|
Sergeant |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 2:08 pm Posts: 133 Location: Gibbons Gender: male
|
ya good battle u deserve the win in the end getting all your members there to the fight and all the anti mechs. we kinda mass produced inf beam cause we figured thats what u were but in the end u showed us.(ps going into this fight we figured we would lose)
_________________ toma
|
|
Top |
|
lilconqueror
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:27 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 2:28 pm Posts: 182
|
ttotheoma wrote: ya good battle u deserve the win in the end getting all your members there to the fight and all the anti mechs. we kinda mass produced inf beam cause we figured thats what u were but in the end u showed us.(ps going into this fight we figured we would lose) try sticking with 1 and only 1 unit type........
_________________ MGH 1st MGH 1st TTE 1st WWs 1st XIRX 4th RFW 2nd Hero 2nd there's a lota pretty girlz in da city  skype littleconqueror1 all welcome to add
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|

|