Author |
Message |
pilot14
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:13 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 5:36 pm Posts: 34
|
Your sub did boost, maybe not all Valient had a load of power with 5 conquers, wanna explain if they didnt boost? I'm pretty sure I said (Besides Valient) so how about you learn to read what I said word for word? xD and yes, Nam did backstab, trying to move into OUR North America and attacking a OP in Asia that belonged to me personally is all the reason for us to retaliate, plus Nam continued hostilities. This invasion is OUR retaliation to continued hostilities from your Noob Alliance. Don't worry, you won't have to argue with us much longer because it's inevitable, you'll be paying taxes soon enough  -The Iron Curtain
|
|
Top |
|
abhixx
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:14 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 8:38 pm Posts: 80 Gender: male
|
Hmmm but u see we don't team up the way u guys team up XD CE are practically your slaves... as they are willing to suicide units against us.... thts wht i learned frm the last battle.... we don't even ask our sub to do tht kind of thing let alone our allies... hence the "slaves".... and Arifureta.. its not tht i don't want the pleasure of destroying 2 alliances at once... but it would look much cooler if it were one on one... anywhoo not up to me to decide wht tactics u are going to employ... all i will say is good luck  pretty darn impressive how u got so many of your members online all at once in such a short amount of time.... this should be better than the one we fought last time 
_________________ Legendary Isotox
Winning Alliances - TLA F2, DETH F6, Milk/FPM M2, SoFe M3, HaHa M1, BoS F1
Families Associated with:- TLA, DETH, HaHa, BoS, FPM
|
|
Top |
|
inoofinqisition
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:19 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 7:47 pm Posts: 42 Gender: male
|
abhixx wrote: Hmmm but u see we don't team up the way u guys team up XD CE are practically your slaves... as they are willing to suicide units against us.... thts wht i learned frm the last battle.... we don't even ask our sub to do tht kind of thing let alone our allies... hence the "slaves".... and Arifureta.. its not tht i don't want the pleasure of destroying 2 alliances at once... but it would look much cooler if it were one on one... anywhoo not up to me to decide wht tactics u are going to employ... all i will say is good luck  pretty darn impressive how u got so many of your members online all at once in such a short amount of time.... this should be better than the one we fought last time  haha Iso, they are Desperate. and the thing is "were not Desperate, just inlove" so just shut up and let them do what they want XD
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
Arifureta
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:57 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 9:40 pm Posts: 230
|
Arifureta wrote: Very well then.
@Theoma i didnt say it was you did i? i know for a fact most of you are like that
@Ino
1- You built 2 ops in Africa - I asked them to be razed
2- You had a member in Iceland - I asked him to relocate and the ops razed, nothing, he only relocated when the war started(3 days after)
3- We enter Greenland and i was told to talk with Shion about it, then you guys attack and try to kill Santa units without any warning
4- You build more ops in Africa (Not talking about the one in saudi)
5- We invite a member in SA, you guys nuke and attack him right away (Refer to number 2)
Hm.. i think thats enough?;) Arifureta wrote: Your wrong Sith  Their excuses are: -Op taken in Saudi (3eta from our colonys, but yes it was a breach on our part) -We entered Greenland (I was told to talk with their leader but i guess they just decided to attack) -We invited someone in SA(Apparently thats a reason to end a nap  ) Sigh.. wathever
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
TheCallum
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:12 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:59 pm Posts: 32 Gender: male
|
-snip- D:
Last edited by TheCallum on Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
TheCallum
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:15 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:59 pm Posts: 32 Gender: male
|
 this op is floating. ._.
|
|
Top |
|
EosAStar
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:28 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:04 pm Posts: 79
|
abhixx wrote: Hmmm but u see we don't team up the way u guys team up XD CE are practically your slaves... as they are willing to suicide units against us.... thts wht i learned frm the last battle.... we don't even ask our sub to do tht kind of thing let alone our allies... hence the "slaves".... and Arifureta.. its not tht i don't want the pleasure of destroying 2 alliances at once... but it would look much cooler if it were one on one... anywhoo not up to me to decide wht tactics u are going to employ... all i will say is good luck  pretty darn impressive how u got so many of your members online all at once in such a short amount of time.... this should be better than the one we fought last time  maybe CE was changing chasis?
|
|
Top |
|
Dylan102
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 2:21 am |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:36 pm Posts: 351 Location: New Zealand Gender: male
|
LOL I didnt buy my way into anywhere and usually when I play I dont donate.. I finished in top 10 few times with no donating =] I send tokens to my alliance to help them rebuild as a gift. And when you play this game for 4yrs, you know people so yes, I knew NAM members long before this era =]
_________________

 MGH - OS - SPAM - COPS - Nam - TLD - DUMB - KnaW - TTM - SoTF - KOOL - HAHA
|
|
Top |
|
trevor1601
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 2:35 am |
|
Captain |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:45 pm Posts: 939
|
dylan you should have sent me tokens...
this will be fun round it looks like. just watching is going to be fun.
_________________


best round-SAGE E2 -312 power most conquers at one point-122
|
|
Top |
|
CodeoftheSith
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:47 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 4:06 pm Posts: 670
|
jesus christ,does it matter if they're boosters? is it really such a bad thing? sure, its harder to fight boosters if you can't buy reds yourself, but they keep the game free, and they fund the improvement of BD in general.
I know that people in Nam, have (maybe not in this era) boosted their fair share, so i wouldn't really go around saying that IRON is a heavy boosting alliance. As i said in my last post, i know many players on both sides, i know the heavy boosters and those that don't, and both sides have their share, whether they are this era or not, idk, nor do i care. but honestly, don't hate on boosters. they help improve BD so let them boost.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|

|