It is currently Sat Jul 19, 2025 9:00 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 158 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 16  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:13 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 5:36 pm
Posts: 34
Your sub did boost, maybe not all
Valient had a load of power with 5 conquers, wanna explain if they didnt boost?

I'm pretty sure I said (Besides Valient) so how about you learn to read what I said word for word? xD and yes, Nam did backstab, trying to move into OUR North America and attacking a OP in Asia that belonged to me personally is all the reason for us to retaliate, plus Nam continued hostilities. This invasion is OUR retaliation to continued hostilities from your Noob Alliance. Don't worry, you won't have to argue with us much longer because it's inevitable, you'll be paying taxes soon enough ;)

-The Iron Curtain


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:14 pm 
Sergeant
Sergeant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 8:38 pm
Posts: 80
Gender: male
Hmmm but u see we don't team up the way u guys team up XD CE are practically your slaves... as they are willing to suicide units against us.... thts wht i learned frm the last battle.... we don't even ask our sub to do tht kind of thing let alone our allies... hence the "slaves".... and Arifureta.. its not tht i don't want the pleasure of destroying 2 alliances at once... but it would look much cooler if it were one on one... anywhoo not up to me to decide wht tactics u are going to employ...

all i will say is good luck :)

pretty darn impressive how u got so many of your members online all at once in such a short amount of time.... this should be better than the one we fought last time :D

_________________
Legendary Isotox

Winning Alliances - TLA F2, DETH F6, Milk/FPM M2, SoFe M3, HaHa M1, BoS F1

Families Associated with:- TLA, DETH, HaHa, BoS, FPM


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:19 pm 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 7:47 pm
Posts: 42
Gender: male
abhixx wrote:
Hmmm but u see we don't team up the way u guys team up XD CE are practically your slaves... as they are willing to suicide units against us.... thts wht i learned frm the last battle.... we don't even ask our sub to do tht kind of thing let alone our allies... hence the "slaves".... and Arifureta.. its not tht i don't want the pleasure of destroying 2 alliances at once... but it would look much cooler if it were one on one... anywhoo not up to me to decide wht tactics u are going to employ...

all i will say is good luck :)

pretty darn impressive how u got so many of your members online all at once in such a short amount of time.... this should be better than the one we fought last time :D

haha Iso, they are Desperate. and the thing is "were not Desperate, just inlove" so just shut up and let them do what they want XD

_________________
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:57 pm 
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 9:40 pm
Posts: 230
Arifureta wrote:
Very well then.

@Theoma i didnt say it was you did i? i know for a fact most of you are like that

@Ino

1- You built 2 ops in Africa - I asked them to be razed

2- You had a member in Iceland - I asked him to relocate and the ops razed, nothing, he only relocated when the war started(3 days after)

3- We enter Greenland and i was told to talk with Shion about it, then you guys attack and try to kill Santa units without any warning

4- You build more ops in Africa (Not talking about the one in saudi)

5- We invite a member in SA, you guys nuke and attack him right away
(Refer to number 2)

Hm.. i think thats enough?;)



Arifureta wrote:
Your wrong Sith :D

Their excuses are:

-Op taken in Saudi (3eta from our colonys, but yes it was a breach on our part)
-We entered Greenland (I was told to talk with their leader but i guess they just decided to attack)
-We invited someone in SA(Apparently thats a reason to end a nap :D)




Sigh.. wathever

_________________
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:12 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:59 pm
Posts: 32
Gender: male
-snip- D:


Last edited by TheCallum on Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:15 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:59 pm
Posts: 32
Gender: male
Image

this op is floating.

._.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:28 pm 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 79
abhixx wrote:
Hmmm but u see we don't team up the way u guys team up XD CE are practically your slaves... as they are willing to suicide units against us.... thts wht i learned frm the last battle.... we don't even ask our sub to do tht kind of thing let alone our allies... hence the "slaves".... and Arifureta.. its not tht i don't want the pleasure of destroying 2 alliances at once... but it would look much cooler if it were one on one... anywhoo not up to me to decide wht tactics u are going to employ...

all i will say is good luck :)

pretty darn impressive how u got so many of your members online all at once in such a short amount of time.... this should be better than the one we fought last time :D


maybe CE was changing chasis?


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 2:21 am 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:36 pm
Posts: 351
Location: New Zealand
Gender: male
LOL I didnt buy my way into anywhere and usually when I play I dont donate.. I finished in top 10 few times with no donating =] I send tokens to my alliance to help them rebuild as a gift. And when you play this game for 4yrs, you know people so yes, I knew NAM members long before this era =]

_________________
Image
Image
MGH - OS - SPAM - COPS - Nam - TLD - DUMB - KnaW - TTM - SoTF - KOOL - HAHA


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 2:35 am 
Captain
Captain
 Profile

Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:45 pm
Posts: 939
dylan you should have sent me tokens...

this will be fun round it looks like. just watching is going to be fun.

_________________
Image
Image

best round-SAGE E2 -312 power
most conquers at one point-122


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:47 am 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 4:06 pm
Posts: 670
jesus christ,does it matter if they're boosters? is it really such a bad thing? sure, its harder to fight boosters if you can't buy reds yourself, but they keep the game free, and they fund the improvement of BD in general.

I know that people in Nam, have (maybe not in this era) boosted their fair share, so i wouldn't really go around saying that IRON is a heavy boosting alliance. As i said in my last post, i know many players on both sides, i know the heavy boosters and those that don't, and both sides have their share, whether they are this era or not, idk, nor do i care. but honestly, don't hate on boosters. they help improve BD so let them boost.

_________________
Image


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 158 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 16  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl