Kenny wrote:
Except he didn't use a black box just to cover the text... If he had just resized it, and added his own text, I'd call him out, but that's not all he did.
If his photo manipulation can't be counted then obviously the one in my sig is a terrible one and isn't even worthy for your eyes.
Well you have just stuck your name over someone elses photograph, but it's a nice photo and so my eyes find it worth viewing.
Quote:
You have yet to prove to me that little work is done, when you fail to realize how many filters that picture has been in, how many gradient maps, and how many different effects he added to make it look more pleasing.
I have the PSD, lots of layers doing not much at all... looks to me like he's seen a tutorial somewhere but doesn't really understand what each layer is for and so just follows the same steps for every image whether needed or not. More than half the layers can be removed with absolutely no change to the final image at all.
Quote:
If his sig is a rip, than 90% of the signatures I saw in an art forum I was with for 2 to 3 years were all rips, and had no artistic talent.
;/
Sounds like a sucky forum... 3 years and no original creations? If that's true then you might be right about the lack of talent.