It is currently Fri Aug 15, 2025 1:17 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 428 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 43  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: ABLE vs SoTF
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 7:09 am 
Major
Major
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:16 am
Posts: 3103
Location: No.
Definition of BD FAIL: LOSS of HUGE amount of UNITS (more then 300) or/and can not manage to even penetrate the hive...

SoFT attack: we penetrated the hive... did not lose huge amount of units

Abel attack #1: penetrated hive LOST UNITS LOTS

Abel attack #2: penetrated hive LOST UNITS like MASSIVE AMOUNTS of UNITS

this is my personal definition...

but dictionary definition:
be unsuccessful in achieving one's goal

ABEL did not suceed their goal in both attacks
SoFT did achieve their task of testing ABEL

therefore SoFT did not fail :D
ABEL did...

_________________
Image
Sig thanks to Darklighter!
CoTM Winner: October


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ABLE vs SoTF
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 7:26 am 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:54 am
Posts: 841
Location: Land - Plains Swamp
goldenpaw wrote:
Definition of BD FAIL: LOSS of HUGE amount of UNITS (more then 300) or/and can not manage to even penetrate the hive...

SoFT attack: we penetrated the hive... did not lose huge amount of units

Abel attack #1: penetrated hive LOST UNITS LOTS

Abel attack #2: penetrated hive LOST UNITS like MASSIVE AMOUNTS of UNITS

this is my personal definition...

but dictionary definition:
be unsuccessful in achieving one's goal

ABEL did not suceed their goal in both attacks
SoFT did achieve their task of testing ABEL

therefore SoFT did not fail :D
ABEL did...


No, we didn't fail because we were just testing you.

EDIT: Maybe you forgot about the 400 units that you lost to dragons...

EDIT 2: If we failed and didn't even penetrate the hive, why did a bunch of you relocate, with the rest placing outposts ready to relocate?

_________________
Battle Dawn Wiki.
W1lll is not currently here. Please leave a message after the tone.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ABLE vs SoTF
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:07 am 
Major
Major
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:16 am
Posts: 3103
Location: No.
sure u guys can say u were just testing...
i clearly remember prison saying that u guys sent him a message about u guys were gonna come for turb cause he as FBI crystals... and we didn't give him up so u set out to destroy us... that sure was testing and u guys tested 2 times!! great job testing...

also usually when u test something the next time u get better but in fact u guys got even worse... ouch

and i did not lose 400 hundred units to a dragon i lost 100 gezz get your facts straight obviously demon must of told everyone that he killed 400 units :P

also relocation was a precaution... you must always consider every possibility... SoFT wont waste everything that SoFT achieved because of ignorance and not considering the possibility of defeat duh... we did not under estimate you any time u attacked

anything is possible :lol:

_________________
Image
Sig thanks to Darklighter!
CoTM Winner: October


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ABLE vs SoTF
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:53 am 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 WWW  ICQ  YIM  Profile

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 12:06 am
Posts: 61
Location: America, in a box, in the road.
Gender: male
goldenpaw wrote:
Definition of BD FAIL: LOSS of HUGE amount of UNITS (more then 300) or/and can not manage to even penetrate the hive...

SoFT attack: we penetrated the hive... did not lose huge amount of units

Abel attack #1: penetrated hive LOST UNITS LOTS

Abel attack #2: penetrated hive LOST UNITS like MASSIVE AMOUNTS of UNITS

this is my personal definition...

but dictionary definition:
be unsuccessful in achieving one's goal

ABEL did not suceed their goal in both attacks
SoFT did achieve their task of testing ABEL

therefore SoFT did not fail :D
ABEL did...


Well maybe we were also "just testing" how strong and what type of build you are? And second, you never chieved the goal of getting into our hive since you never managed to get onto our island.
Oh and also, ABEL didnt fall, as I recall we are STILL number 1, even if SOTF has a 100+ crystal lead over us, so its quite obvious whos fallen and who hasent.
Oh and as for me not wanting to send in 120 squads taking on 170+. WHy would i take on something at such a lopsided advantage to one side? Seems like commen sense to me, but i guess not even SOTF can achieve such a minor ounce of intellegence to figure that one out.

_________________
The Light
Top alliances:ABEL NWL and WIT
Relics held:4
Best Rank: 4


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ABLE vs SoTF
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 10:22 am 
Captain
Captain
 Profile

Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:45 pm
Posts: 939
an inteligent team doesnt send in 271 squads at a member of an alliance then go to sleep when there were 350 squads being sent to defend. :D thats doesnt seem intelligent to me. also our score went down like 2000 and yours went down 5000 or so. and we were in 1st until u decided to boost back your losses. but dont worry we should be in 1st again within a few days.

Also r u forgetting the 2000 score from the 2 extra relics u have?

_________________
Image
Image

best round-SAGE E2 -312 power
most conquers at one point-122


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ABLE vs SoTF
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 10:42 am 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:54 am
Posts: 841
Location: Land - Plains Swamp
goldenpaw wrote:
sure u guys can say u were just testing...
i clearly remember prison saying that u guys sent him a message about u guys were gonna come for turb cause he as FBI crystals... and we didn't give him up so u set out to destroy us... that sure was testing and u guys tested 2 times!! great job testing...

also usually when u test something the next time u get better but in fact u guys got even worse... ouch

and i did not lose 400 hundred units to a dragon i lost 100 gezz get your facts straight obviously demon must of told everyone that he killed 400 units :P

also relocation was a precaution... you must always consider every possibility... SoFT wont waste everything that SoFT achieved because of ignorance and not considering the possibility of defeat duh... we did not under estimate you any time u attacked

anything is possible :lol:


400 in total for the alliance...

_________________
Battle Dawn Wiki.
W1lll is not currently here. Please leave a message after the tone.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ABLE vs SoTF
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 3:22 pm 
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 269
Location: CaLi
Gender: male
w1lll wrote:
goldenpaw wrote:
Definition of BD FAIL: LOSS of HUGE amount of UNITS (more then 300) or/and can not manage to even penetrate the hive...

SoFT attack: we penetrated the hive... did not lose huge amount of units

Abel attack #1: penetrated hive LOST UNITS LOTS

Abel attack #2: penetrated hive LOST UNITS like MASSIVE AMOUNTS of UNITS

this is my personal definition...

but dictionary definition:
be unsuccessful in achieving one's goal

ABEL did not suceed their goal in both attacks
SoFT did achieve their task of testing ABEL

therefore SoFT did not fail :D
ABEL did...


No, we didn't fail because we were just testing you.

EDIT: Maybe you forgot about the 400 units that you lost to dragons...

EDIT 2: If we failed and didn't even penetrate the hive, why did a bunch of you relocate, with the rest placing outposts ready to relocate?


hahahahahahahahahahaha

testing us wouldnt be losing 300 squads against us. :twisted:

_________________
Wins:
NWL, G1 e1
SoTF, E2 e7

SiCk!


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ABLE vs SoTF
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:00 pm 
Sergeant
Sergeant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:49 pm
Posts: 150
Quote:
Also r u forgetting the 2000 score from the 2 extra relics u have?


Quoted by No prisoner...


@no prisoner...
either ur dumb.. or ur really bad at maths
ur still low in score.. even if we have 2 relics that = 2000 score

and ur 100 + crystals... that equals to more than 2000 score..
either way we r nearly 300 more power than u..
and thats even with a member who has only 75 power..
so yeah..
i dont see how u can rank 1 now :D

_________________
http://battledawnfans.com
Image
Image
Alliance:
ABEL#1
WiN#1
NWL #1


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ABLE vs SoTF
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:15 pm 
Captain
Captain
 Profile

Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:45 pm
Posts: 939
well once we take ur 4 relics we will be ahead of you like 10000 score so that will put us in first.

one thing u guys need to learn about this game is that even if you are number 1 you can easily be taken down by a alliance or more than one alliance that uses coordination and teamwork. so dont get used to being first. because the shadows like being in 1 when it counts at the end of the game

_________________
Image
Image

best round-SAGE E2 -312 power
most conquers at one point-122


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ABLE vs SoTF
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:16 pm 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:20 pm
Posts: 1268
If you guys keep losing armies like you did before, they'll be rank one :)

_________________
【Wins】 - 【12】
【Earth】【RoL】【RoL】【SoTF】【DoP】
【Mars】 【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【COPS】【DRAW】
【Fantasy】【EB】【Wolf】


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 428 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 43  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl