Just so I am positively clear on this

1st battle = RT wins
2nd Battle = DETH wins

Is this correct?

McCragge

Admin Andrew, I understand exactly what you are saying, but there is only one problem.

First, if we had won the first battle like we should have, DETH said they would have turned.
Second, if we had won like we were supposed to we would have killed the remaining DETH units.
Garry was one tick after DETH with his entire army AND then spy on the OP still worked, so even if DETH had for some reason continued with the attack we would have finished off their remaining forces.

So we either would have ended up with no second battle or killing off the remaining DETH units.

You aren't making sense Jason.

IF you had won the first battle, that would leave you in possession of the outpost, so the second battle, you wouldn't be able to use the spy as you would now be defender and we were attackers.

But I don't know why you are complaining, you have your armies pretty much rebuilt over night, even though the Admin says we won both battles.

Must be nice to lose and still get your armies.

McCragge

Our armies weren't close to be rebuilt over night. None of us that lost got back what atleast half

And what Jason means is, the spy on the outpost was still able to trap you there, whilst one of our members were still going, if we had out units not as damaged as it was from the first two battles he would have continued as a third battle as the attackers whilst you'd be defending the outpost and we'd do the spies again. (this is probably what Jason means)

I really don't care anymore. Getting some of the resources is better than none I suppose...

No. What Mikeyy said is correct.
This is what I mean.

We attack your outpost, lock it down, spy attack. We win the battle like we are supposed to and are still locked down while you guys attack us and win. (the theoretical BR that the admin posted) Then if we had to we could lock down again, and we could have spy attacked so that Garry, who was 1 ETA after, would have killed the remaining units from the 2nd battle.

I understand you would have one the 2nd battle, but you would have been severely hurt and Garry's army would have taken you out.

Either that or you guys would have turned and the 2nd battle would have never happened, either way we would still have our armies.


And right now our members who had 120-170 power now have 60-80. Chad went from I think he said 46 to 18 squads.

I can explain it to you in MSN if you need me to.

So we Can now call RT official sub of FFU lol

Actually no, you wouldn't have your armies.

You win first battle.

Surviving troops destroyed in second battle

Garry the only one who has army left. And I had the rest of my army arriving at the same time as Garry's granted it was only 8 squads but they wouldn't have been hit by the spy.

So, you guys shouldn't have an army like the Admin said. I am glad we got this all sorted it out looks like the Admin has this covered on battles that actually happened in comparison to theoretical battles that didn't happen.

McCragge

What would have happened is that Garry's army would have killed everything and probably would have lost a ton or all.

You had 600 range veh left, we could have spy attacked them and then Garry's army would have killed all 600 and your 8 squads, although as I said before he probably would have lost a ton or everything.

So we should get compensated for all 600 units.

So you should get compensated for something you DIDN'T do?

Since Garry never attacked, you can't include that in the results that were bugged. You can only go off the two attacks that DID happen. You claim to know what was going to happen next in hindsight. But again those are hypothetical, and didn't happen so should have no bearing on what DID happen and was glitched.

McCragge

It was a direct result of the glitch.

And I do know what would have happened. You can say the exact same thing for the 2 battles because they NEVER happened without the spy glitch.