Author |
Message |
cbuzz24
|
Post subject: Re: mL vs F69 Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:55 pm |
|
Corporal |
 |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:00 pm Posts: 77 Gender: male
|
Since the thread that I started concerning the lack of character that I perceive in f69 was locked by an f69 member (without me asking for it to be locked, coincidentally), I'll finish up here. Kane, you haven't proven ANYBODY wrong. You love to tell people that they are wrong while declaring how right you are. Each and every argument that I've seen from you in the past two years has followed this pattern. Mind you, this is how arguments are supposed to go, but that is actually what you do: Tell the opponent he is wrong and you are right....all without giving anything of substance. Come on now! Your wrong, I'm right, end of argument? You can do better can't you? Kind of like your last attempt to try to convince me of your correctness. Seriously....I'm demonizing my friends in f69 because I can't fight against someone that I see as a friend? LoL......Sounds like you're grasping for straws to try to demonize ME!  I'm still waiting for your explanation of how you came to this conclusion. Come to think of it, I'm still waiting for answers to the quite simple yes or no questions that I asked in MY thread that was locked. Nobody from f69 is willing to answer those to the point, relevant questions, evidently. Strange....... On topic for this thread: Sheesh! What took you guys so long to start your invasion of North America? I've been waiting for a week now. Come on already! It stinks that you can jam our gates now. Would have been nice to jam ya'lls gates in Asia back when ya'll decided to backstab! That's fine, though...As Kane has told me, I need to adapt, even if it means that I have to attack a friendly alliance. Strange timing on the gate jamming implementation, though. Especially since only 4 f69 members are coming across to NA from southwest Greenland. It would be nice to gate in and meet them, but alas, that advantage was taken out after f69 utilized that tactic to our detriment....... 
|
|
Top |
|
psg188
|
Post subject: Re: mL vs F69 Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:10 pm |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:18 pm Posts: 1410 Location: Georgia Tech Gender: male
|
Not our fault you stayed near our gates, try playing the game and quit complaining. You again, as usual, are being a hypocrite and ignore my arguments in favor of just saying "You are wrong because I say so"... I have a plethora of points you never touched. It would be a waste of time for me to report them, try going back and reading them. As for attacking a friendly alliance, attacks were sent when you were marked red. 
_________________ Kane - GLA - LoM - UBL - TdCt - Simp -------------- Beware the wrath of Ovaltine Jenkins, for he shall show no mercy.
|
|
Top |
|
redwurm
|
Post subject: Re: mL vs F69 Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:19 pm |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:00 pm Posts: 799 Location: Ohio Gender: male
|
It does seem a bit odd that would implement the gate jamming NOW of all times. Might as well let the round play out and fix it afterwords since we have all been playing according to that logic. Ah well, their is always next round.  Oh, and I requested the thread to be locked..didn't seem like anyone was getting anywhere.
_________________ mL / AI / Prr / ROTR / Meow / KM
Oluvai wrote: There is no clue boost. bfan8475 wrote: If i cant put up better comebacks to your insults then its called bullying since i cant put up a fight
|
|
Top |
|
psg188
|
Post subject: Re: mL vs F69 Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:50 pm |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:18 pm Posts: 1410 Location: Georgia Tech Gender: male
|
I've been complaining about gate jamming for ages, as has many other people. It was the biggest imbalance in the game and needed to be fixed a month ago, much less now. So it's not a flaw we should keep around just because it's not convenient for you that it gets fixed. It's impossible to attack a well organized alliance if they know how to abuse gates. IMPOSSIBLE!
_________________ Kane - GLA - LoM - UBL - TdCt - Simp -------------- Beware the wrath of Ovaltine Jenkins, for he shall show no mercy.
|
|
Top |
|
redwurm
|
Post subject: Re: mL vs F69 Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:51 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:00 pm Posts: 799 Location: Ohio Gender: male
|
Which is why I was hoping it would still be around until the round was over.
_________________ mL / AI / Prr / ROTR / Meow / KM
Oluvai wrote: There is no clue boost. bfan8475 wrote: If i cant put up better comebacks to your insults then its called bullying since i cant put up a fight
|
|
Top |
|
cbuzz24
|
Post subject: Re: mL vs F69 Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:55 am |
|
Corporal |
 |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:00 pm Posts: 77 Gender: male
|
psg188 wrote: I've been complaining about gate jamming for ages, as has many other people. It was the biggest imbalance in the game and needed to be fixed a month ago, much less now. So it's not a flaw we should keep around just because it's not convenient for you that it gets fixed. It's impossible to attack a well organized alliance if they know how to abuse gates. IMPOSSIBLE! LoL...yes, but it's funny how it is implemented now, when it favors you. I am aware that you have been calling for it for weeks now. I just wish it had been implemented a couple of weeks ago. Then, all of this arguing that's been going on could possibly be moot (at least in theory), as we could have just jammed f69 gates and fared a bit better. Would have given us a fighting chance, anyway or at least to have escaped to fight another day on different terms. The great Kane complaining about someone complaining. Imagine that!.....lol Nice job skirting around without answering anything.....AGAIN! Care to comment on just how you manage to do that? As for being marked as red, yes, that has been covered. You guys decided to mark us as hostile after having us as marked as friendly the whole round just so you could justify your betrayal. That about sums it up, correct?  EDIT: Forgot to add that the turnaround time from being marked as friendly to being attacked was 3 ticks according to a few of your members. Quite gentlemanly of you to wait an hour and a half before you attacked rather than doing so immediately! Still waiting for you to tackle the simple questions that I asked. I don't recall you asking any questions for me to answer. If you did, feel free to repeat them and I will answer them to the best of my ability. I do apologize if I failed to answer your questions, if you actually asked any.
|
|
Top |
|
Gaurav
|
Post subject: Re: mL vs F69 Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:58 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:00 pm Posts: 687 Gender: male
|
Can you repeat your questions Cbuzz, you have mentioned asking them quite a few times but I am still yet to see what you asked. Now about us waiting to attack, is there a point seeing as mL is relocating to Antarctica (your leader has already done so). -Gaurav
_________________ Championship Era 2013 Winner (DoCE/VND) FORMER SENIOR MODERATOR 8+ years of Battledawn
|
|
Top |
|
Maniac
|
Post subject: Re: mL vs F69 Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:17 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:53 am Posts: 70 Gender: male
|
HaHa! mL hilarious as always !
Some F69 troops set foot in North America and mL members start abandonong the hive to go to the coop !
I don't think we have attacked a single mL op in Noth America yet and they are running - sorry, its probably called a 'strategic withdrawal'.
New mL plan - let's hide behind CRAP !!
- LMAO!
_________________ E4 KOA - BUL5 E4 Fozzie Bear - The Muppets E1 Juggernaut - The Xavier Institute E1 Mo of KOA - The Fighting 69th E3-A5 Mo of Kingdom of Armagh - ARM E3-A6 Barney Gumble - The Simpsons
|
|
Top |
|
redwurm
|
Post subject: Re: mL vs F69 Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:38 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:00 pm Posts: 799 Location: Ohio Gender: male
|
That's a bit low Mo. Why don't you grow up a bit.
You handed us a beating in Asia and it will not be easy to recover, that beating initiated a lot of inactivity within the alliance. In some aspects that inactivity lead to some getting kicked/conquered depending on the situation. All of this together has lead to a significant dropping in score. We are in no position to launch a major offensive against F69 at this point to right the wrongs done to us, but we are in a position to retreat..rebuild and live to fight another day.
Call it what you will, and sit here and act like a 4 year old about it if you must. But I didn't see mL coming on this board and ridiculing an alliance for relocating away from us when we setup shop in Asia. Not only did we not ridicule them, but you decided to protect them.
The hypocrisy in this game is astonishing sometimes, I'm going to have to remember this for future rounds. Apparently this is how you win.
Do as I say, not as I do!
_________________ mL / AI / Prr / ROTR / Meow / KM
Oluvai wrote: There is no clue boost. bfan8475 wrote: If i cant put up better comebacks to your insults then its called bullying since i cant put up a fight
|
|
Top |
|
Gaurav
|
Post subject: Re: mL vs F69 Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:53 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:00 pm Posts: 687 Gender: male
|
It has come to my knowledge that mL, or Vicious to be more precise, is abusing a bug with the gates. I warned him on msn from abusing the bug and got an obscene response. The bug consists of a jammed gate being downgraded to remove the jam then being upgraded back to a gate.
I found this bug a few hours ago and tested/reported it to Andrew. I was hoping no one else would find it..but guess its out now. I am warning all players now that abuse of this bug will not be looked nicely on by the Admins and players may even face consequences such as bans for this action. Abuse of bugs is against the ToS of this game.
-Gaurav
_________________ Championship Era 2013 Winner (DoCE/VND) FORMER SENIOR MODERATOR 8+ years of Battledawn
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|

|