Just going to say something. I'm in NOVA (Gene's leader) and were right below TDT. Sure, they could kill us anytime they want too and get some easy crystals. But instead, they help us grow and give us protection. Obviously there not as untrustworthy and hypocritical as FRND makes them out to be. And as far as I'm concerned, your all acting like kids. I've lost literally more than 20 different eras spanning more than 5 different worlds, and have been backstabbed many times. I would do anything to be in the rank 1 alliance for just one era. You think I'm joking? Proof: I'm 13 and I know about all of you are at least 18+. Am I wrong? Stop calling each other hypocrites and keep the friendship and trust that you still may have with each other intact.

Because I hate being conquered or disrespected. It will be answered in the appropriate fashion.



It could be anything for you. If we had a NAP, and if both of us were looking for a win, and you wanted to eliminate a threat, and you teamed up on us, or attacked us, backstabbing us then I would have been fine with it. When an alliance just sits there and tells you, you can have everything, and have the win, then NAP or not, your reasons for attacking that alliance are nil, strategically speaking.

We were of no threat, and ideally I wouldn't make that kind of a deal with an alliance, unless I trusted them. I trusted your alliance, because I knew everyone in it, and I didn't think people there would backstab. We had a similar kind of a deal with Garry, Duo and his alliance last era, and we gave up 5 relics for them to win. Even though we were quite powerful. Infact equal. Just cuz we gave our word.

Therefore No. M4 is not just M4. I look at players and the way they treat me as the sole criteria for judgement. I don't care how experienced or good you are, but there are certain things that go beyond a round. Again, the reason am pissed off, is not cuz you "backstabbed". I can care less about this round. We weren't gonna win it anyway. I am pissed at your poor judgement. You chose a noob like Alisa, an idiot like Edwin, over Matt, myself and others in the alliance. So be it.



We are not sore losers. Beat us in an even fight and then call us sore loses if we complain. Ive always fought outnumbered, but there is something called respect that you show someone. Atleast someone you know. Seems, we were the respectful ones and werent quite appreciated. Whatever. Now we know whom to trust, and whom not to.

Quick word here.

I'm a bit confused at why there's all this 'suspicion of backstab' going around. Last era, TSK and AM (mfreak's) had a full era allieship and, despite a sizeable amount of the alliance worried about AM, I decided to trust AM that that worked out fine. Why is the suspicion of backstabbing rampaging?

Furthermore, TDT really could have done better to give at least 100 ticks warning. That would've been the right thing to do. Yeah, it's just a game, but at least I believe that the way you play this game reflects a fundamental character.

AM were planning to war you, but didn't cause they thought you guys had more units
And after reading through all these pages I have come to the conclusion that there is one set of rules for Allen and another set of rules for everyone else.

That explains why you are a numbnut. What did you read through the last 7 pages that gave you that idea genius? Can you tell me what rules you talking about? Also, AM were never planning to war TSK. We stuck to our word about everything. Even here. Its just a matter of maturity. Of course I shouldnt have expected an alliance led by a 14 yr old, with noobs like Alisa, Dylan etc to stick to their word. My bad.

love your ragging keep going

You trusted teller to keep his word?
(I'm not known for hating on teller at all)

Here's a pretty embarrassing fact for you--I f'd up majorly in keeping AM around last era. In the end, AM had a better gate network than us in a lot of places, and if you look at te screenshots Garry posted, they were pretty damn close in power. If AM wanted to go for the win, they would've had a pretty decent shot and they, speaking as objectively as I can as a member of TSK, probably would've won considering how inactive we were. Allen decided not to fight, and from that alone I can probably safely say that your suspicions really wasn't warranted.

Backstabbing is, I feel, a very legit strategy, but from what I've seen, this one is pretty stupid in that the backstabbers didnt have the balls to step up to what they did, plus certain member's efforts to distance themselves from the whole issue. Meh.

And for the record, I choose to believe age and maturity don't have a correlation.

lol Agreed to a certain extend. I mean you cant expect a 5 yr old to be mature. lol. But in Teller's case it does lol. Or maybe Edwin. They change leaders like everyday.

Call it what you like mfreak.