Play Free War Battle Games Online, Multiplayer Games, Strategy Games, Top MMORPG

ShadowReaperX · **Posted:** Thu Mar 10, 2011 5:50 pm

Anarchist69x wrote:

Quote:

im starting to doubt u guys wont get in the top 3

Who said RDH is trying to get top 3?

We're just a bunch of inactives having fun doing what we do best.

Yep a bunch of inactives that attack with 12 people on a relic

Also montana said that rank 2 would be nice

And a inactive alliance doesnt need a relic haha

Anarchist69x · **Joined:** Thu Jan 20, 2011 8:30 pm **Posts:** 371

Quote:

And a inactive alliance doesnt need a relic haha

Alliances that back-stab their own members don't deserve the relic(s) either.

ShadowReaperX · **Posted:** Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:09 pm

Anarchist69x wrote:

Quote:

And a inactive alliance doesnt need a relic haha

Alliances that back-stab their own members don't deserve the relic(s) either.

Good thing we arent backstabbers.

Enro quit
Fleur quit
Kenney inactive for 150 ticks so quit
Bobby wanted to leave for AL and/or wanted to quit (End with a BANG)
Plus all the other people who quit like HateMe of HaTeMe or Nix of UTM

So yeah we never really backstabbed anyone unless they did.

Ilona · **Posted:** Fri Mar 11, 2011 3:10 am

to get some facts straight:

I joined m4 to watch only. Later, some friends asked if i want to lead for fun and joined me. We were rank 13 as ORB started to give us metal. Now we are #4

Sorry Shadow, its not my fault if AL and UTM are not able to be coordinated enough and attack with more than 2 members.
I don't need to apologize that we took the relic and that we did it with all members.

We don't put much effort into M4. Its just an era with less competition.
I don't know on which rank we will end - and i don't care.

All we do is what BD is made for: Having fun and fight as team. Whats wrong with that?

Anarchist69x · **Joined:** Thu Jan 20, 2011 8:30 pm **Posts:** 371

My comment was more directed towards Guess Who for back-stabbing both me and PsychomantisX right at the beginning. Don't really know or care what happend with UTM and why they're suddenly going through a funk that's their business not mine.

ShadowReaperX · **Posted:** Fri Mar 11, 2011 5:05 pm

gipsy wrote:

to get some facts straight:

I joined m4 to watch only. Later, some friends asked if i want to lead for fun and joined me. We were rank 13 as ORB started to give us metal. Now we are #4

Sorry Shadow, its not my fault if AL and UTM are not able to be coordinated enough and attack with more than 2 members.
I don't need to apologize that we took the relic and that we did it with all members.

We don't put much effort into M4. Its just an era with less competition.
I don't know on which rank we will end - and i don't care.

All we do is what BD is made for: Having fun and fight as team. Whats wrong with that?

Yo its all good! This is all fun for me too

Don't apologize for anything

I wish there was just 1 server where all the best alliances came together. Like i wanna see SKY, DETH, NWL, SYN, GALA, DE, you know all them awesome alliances. Now that would be awesome. Maybe in the summer they can do some event

branabus · **Joined:** Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:19 am **Posts:** 60

To interject with some statistics that you might find useful:
According to a spreadsheet which calculates purely on power, AL (taken to mean AL and anyone allied with it) is winning by quite a large margin, with UTM (taken to mean UTM and anyone allied with it) trailing by around 10,000.
However, UTM does have a greater concentration of power, meaning that overall their players are superior in power to AL's, but AL itself is winning on the individual power per member, so AL's players have more power individually than UTM's.
If all the currently unaligned alliances joined UTM, UTM would have the greatest power.
Please note that this only takes account of the top 12 alliances, meaning that any below them (RAGE, smaller UTM subs, GALA etc.) are not considered, which does slightly skew the overall score in AL's favour, but also skews the concentration of power in UTM's favour.

VaultDweller · **Posted:** Sat Mar 12, 2011 10:58 am

Perhaps, but were winning ground now ^_^ kenney's units are dead with minimal losses, warlord almost was the same :lol:

and it seems UTM's RedBull is wearing out xD

krlosjoc1 · **Joined:** Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:47 pm **Posts:** 35

winning ground or recovering ground?? remember that the territory you are reffering to, is not even close to our hive... so was about time.. besides UTM with 9 members and a backstabber (bobby)... you have to take every chance you got because you cant win directly.... any way dont worry soon you will loose again territory

Ilona · **Posted:** Sat Mar 12, 2011 12:12 pm

lol Vault

you should mention the 123 tanks of strawberry as well

RDH will still stay out of that for now - as long as no one drag us into the war.

branabus wrote:

To interject with some statistics that you might find useful:
According to a spreadsheet which calculates purely on power, AL (taken to mean AL and anyone allied with it) is winning by quite a large margin, with UTM (taken to mean UTM and anyone allied with it) trailing by around 10,000.
However, UTM does have a greater concentration of power, meaning that overall their players are superior in power to AL's, but AL itself is winning on the individual power per member, so AL's players have more power individually than UTM's.
If all the currently unaligned alliances joined UTM, UTM would have the greatest power.
Please note that this only takes account of the top 12 alliances, meaning that any below them (RAGE, smaller UTM subs, GALA etc.) are not considered, which does slightly skew the overall score in AL's favour, but also skews the concentration of power in UTM's favour.

I don't know where you are ingame but that is BS. Please do a closer look. AI which doesn't consider themselves as a sub has the most power.

UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs