If Kane's lying, it would show his true character and explain to many why everyone's against him all of a sudden.

If not, it would prove that Kane was correct and that these other comments are made out of spite or jealousy or any other random reasons.

While it does seem rather off topic, it has a valid purpose.

***

Sorry, had to respond to try and explain the situation Kane, you'll have my response to your last comment in a bit... if only I could type faster

That's a good point Sizir, to turn the conversation to something that is more interesting. (That is if the other side is satisfied or they want my shipping receipts too)

Has anyone else seen the parallels to the 2nd Punic War?

Wilson/Niracas = Hannibal

Prr = Carthage
MupT = Roman Empire

I don't know who Scipio Africanus would be, as we all sort of came over here together. I just think it's interesting. We can't catch Wilson/Niracas as they jump from new OP to new OP. Much like Hannibal couldn't be caught inside Rome. They can't do much damage though and in fact have only managed to set off one shield despite paying many times that E in jams and not to mention the worker costs from all the OPs. Rather than try to catch this uncatchable army we decide to wreak their homeland much like Rome did. Only difference is Carthage was not able to run to Antarctica when the Roman legions salted their land and razed their cities to the ground, Prr has that luxury.

you stay behind in the past man.
play game.
New round new opportunities,
We do not have old wounds to get here in this topic now!
you think too much. and talk to much.

ALRIGHT.. WE ARE HANNIBAL..

Oh my god, we are talking about digging up old MSN convo's from E1A1 on the old client. I'm reading through this thinking it was E1A1 from the new, but we are talking about the old client. Sheesh, that was ages ago. Get with the times clowns...


For all you clowns trying to live in the past, I still have an old one of these if you want to buy it...

@Kane

While there is truth in the statement that things have changed, if you're lying about things like this, it wouldn't show much of a change on your part.

If you knew where the logs were, which you seemed very confident about their locations when you said this "I'll dig through your old chat logs to prove it if I have to," then you would've known they were on the list of files that were overwritten when you had the hard drive fixed. I don't doubt you're intelligent, so why did an intelligent person like yourself bother to search through your latest hard drive when you knew the logs wouldn't be on it, nor the second hard drive since you got it AFTER you had the first one wiped clean? Just a little inconsistent there... along with much of what followed.

You can call it a bluff, fine, but why go to such overwhelming lengths to protect a bluff that was obviously not hindering anyone's arguments? Unless you intended to lie and defame people's arguments with said bluff. I say defame because you couldn't risk correcting yourself after the fact or you'd be back in the same position that had you lying to begin with, so you'd have no choice but to let everyone believe what you said was true and that all the other arguments against you in relation to the "bluff" were from hateful players with a grudge or some other reason to lie about you.

While to those with the facts this wouldn't apply, and they would simply carry on their attacks towards you, it would hurt their credibility in other arguments because people could simply look back to this incident and claim they were trying to repeat it all over again.

********Translated below as best I could... I know the above is hard to follow, and my apologies for that********

In far simpler terms that even I'll admit I need (it's bad when you need help to follow your own thoughts, lol), you were going to let your lies go unchallenged and make your opponents out to be the lairs while continuing to use the same tactics over and over again.

"Incriminate your opponent faster than they can incriminate you and you'll win" seems to be your mantra in life.

Then again, this is all based on if my previous assumptions are correct, and you're free to challenge them. I'm definitely not perfect, and I'll admit if I'm wrong. I would keep the above in mind though, cause depending on your answer we may end up back here >.> in which case I definitely won't retype all that , lol, and I'll try to condense any further comments to a less page filling size. Also, I claim nothing but quotes and deductions as facts (deductions being that my conclusions are valid from their point of view, not necessarily correct). I'm not trying to smear you, but I don't want to see an important factor such as your trustworthiness, or lack thereof, AND the opposition's trustworthiness, or lack thereof, brushed under the rug and forgotten. This would explain if the war is a grudge match, or simply the community turning against you for your recent E4 actions.

Prove this wrong Mupt..

Proven to be liars?

Wow, an involved post. You way overestimate my deviousness. BD time and real time aren't very well coordinated. I have no idea when E1A1 was compared to events in my schooling, when I started college, when I got a new computer, etc. Simply put, I didn't realize E1A1 was before I needed to upgrade, I spoke before I made sure I had the logs, I should have checked first and I didn't. That's really all there is to it.

As for those two conquered colonies, I'm not quite sure what that screenshot proves. Care to elaborate?

Well, my argument's pretty much done with since there's no way to confirm or deny the time issue. I have to admit, that was not the ending I'd anticipated, lol.



Not necessarily...

lol

Not sure what you wish spun. A few days ago we entered the heart of Prr territory surrounded by red. Now, Prr's gone. Were you attempting to show that because I once had a blue return idicator that I once turned around?

Sorry I've missed the fun. Been handling a family weekend with my little one's third birthday. It appears I have some catching up to do. When I was here last, the whole world wasn't red .