Play Free War Battle Games Online, Multiplayer Games, Strategy Games, Top MMORPG

trevor1601 · **Joined:** Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:45 pm **Posts:** 939

i have already said im not in any alliance on E4.
also i have never lost against kev.
i am a third party observer here.
and i have no grudges against you kev.

But you broke the nap. accept it and stop repeating the same old everyone is doing this because everyone hates me. its not the reason. the reason is you broke the NAP.

psg188 · **Posted:** Tue Jul 26, 2011 2:35 pm

I love that you claim you are not on the server and yet are certain what the terms were and the circumstances revolving war breaking out again. Certainly doesn't sound like bias to me! lol!

trevor1601 · **Joined:** Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:45 pm **Posts:** 939

yes...because in the first 12 pages their was no talk about the agreement.

And that whole thing about ping admitting breaking the NAP. that was never said.

i must be on the wrong thread, please point me in the direction of the other thread where the first 12 pages contain GIFT breaking the NAP.

you just got schooled son. have good day.

psg188 · **Posted:** Tue Jul 26, 2011 2:52 pm

Ah yes, the 12 pages of SNN players complaining... now why would an alliance complain when they got thrown out of a continent and forced to relocate? Obviously they are being completely honest.

You make me laugh

trevor1601 · **Joined:** Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:45 pm **Posts:** 939

it is funny how you completely avoid where ping admitted to breaking the NAP... and just say that the thread is just SNN complaining

You just got schooled again

but please go on in your next post which will be completely irrelevant to the issue at hand. (it is kind of funny)

psg188 · **Posted:** Tue Jul 26, 2011 4:27 pm

Ping attacked as a feint, and pulled back (though made a mistake), this was already after SNN had violated terms of the agreement. You continue talking about which you know nothing...

tootje · **Posted:** Tue Jul 26, 2011 6:41 pm

psg188 wrote:

Hey Avi nice of you to chime in, I prefer to respond in game rather than the forum, that's what I'm getting at.

After this era will you be removing that part of your signature?

lets make a new one? with a flag under it:P

trevor1601 · **Joined:** Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:45 pm **Posts:** 939

since subs were not in agreement what did they break?

psg188 · **Posted:** Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:04 pm

The agreement not to match ETAs to conquers/OPs on purpose. Which they admitted to doing on purpose later.

Also they attacked GIFT OPs... I just didn't create a forum thing to whine about it.

skwrel · **Posted:** Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:07 am

psg188 wrote:

The agreement not to match ETAs to conquers/OPs on purpose. Which they admitted to doing on purpose later.

Also they attacked GIFT OPs... I just didn't create a forum thing to whine about it.

I just re-read our talk for the 3rd time to checkin before i start going off here, but it was never agreed upon, it was just brought up. I never agreed to that term. You stated yourself in the topic "SNN vs GIFt" we agreed to 3 terms. That wasn't one of um. Anyone who cares to feel free to check that and come back here and let me know if that is stated, then i stand corrected. Btw, i suggest you don't edit that post kane, i screenshotted it.

Secondly, I really love how you claim to our sniping with more sniping kane. I think is quite funny. Those supposed attacked Ops you keep rambling on about, well how did you get them, oh thats right, you sniped them right in front of us, what a coiencidence huh?? Those so called attacking GIFt ops, was unintentional and was brought on by your own hand. They were yellow when the attack was launched. Apperently, GIFT likes putting units in front of trains, good thing im not in your army.

GIFT breaking NAP???