I've played with around 3 of these people before actually.

If you count entire rounds just 2 of them.

I have played with 3 of the guys in Prr previously as well

Is it really a slam against Kane that he can get people to play with him more than once? How about instead of telling him to play with others, you guys find people you can play with more than once. If that's all it is, that's awesome and easy.

This is my first era with Kane. My last too, as I've always planned it to be my last. Kane's one HELL of a leader. Very organized. Very quick. Very motivational. Other than the extra rough requirement of daily cyber, he's perfect .

I suspect he could easily take newbies and make them winners if they fit the criteria of player he seeks which STARTS with activity level.

Nir-kitty,

The point of every game you play in life is to win. It is true I do not see another reason to play the game and it's true my point of playing it is to win the era. I've actually been in three eras. We've won two. This one ain't over.

Now, like YOUR boy, Puff Pastry says, it adds to the flavor and fun of the game to have political forums of this sort which create drama and fun. I do apologize that I am unable to sit around the cyber fire with you, holding hands, talking about the weather here, but, last I checked, this wasn't the E4 weather board.

The only person who doesn't seem to be in the spirit of things is you.

Well, you ARE in the spirit of things when you feel good and think you're winning. I just know that NOW you'd like it to stop.

lets see..

I played with toot 2 times..
I played with will 2 times (including this round)
I played with stinky 2 times (including this round)

Everyone else i never played with before.

Thanks for taking us offtopic again although it already is and for attacking me piggy I expected it, to reply civily to you. Our point was that he complains about competition.

When you repeatedly build an alliance with the most active/veteran people then complain to others about lack of competition, the complaints fall on deaf ears.

I've purposely gone out of my way to play with many many players and help people out. Does this mean you haven't at all no, but I'm not going to waste my time pre-emptively defending myself from the impending flames/trolls.

Wow. I am a potent force in the universe, for I can take us off topic even in a topic I started. This is some thunderous power.

You write "Our point....blah....blah.....blah....". I started the thread with the point OF the thread. NANC's sudden attack on Prr. I'm certain you have a number of fine points on a number of other topics. You've shared them here and have complained about someone else wanting to win and using the propaganda forum for (GASP) propoganda, about others playing with the same people and that if those people complain about competition, they shouldn't, because it's their fault there isn't any because they play together.

Fine topics. All introduced by you in a thread about another. So, really, it was Nir-Kitty who went off topic and I'm to blame for trying to follow your meanderings? It's called conversation, Nir-Kitty. I won't ever stop you from making a point. I won't ever stop trying to answer the point you make. I recommend you allow the same traits in yourself and in others.

Given I have great faith in your own ability to say one thing and do another (oh, say, like, I'm done with this, then speak about this, or, oh, leave me alone, then contact me), I assume it's easy for you to say someone else is doing something you did, but, stop that.

Redwurm has engaged the thread's topic nicely adding great E4 flavor by presenting a reasonable side of things.

Thanks for pointing out my wrong word choice in using "offtopic". I'll go get my theasaurus and get "ontopic".

Mupt took NANC's relic. We took the neutral one(which Mupt had already attacked).

Then we took the relic which mupt took from NANC.

Happy?

Well you're happy because you got me to reply to you again, but now to pick apart my post and counterattack.


Enjoy. Thought I'd give you some more.

Yeah, the standard Prr troll spasm. Dukey has tried to find the lock button seven times I hear. You guys are nothing if not predictable. Tell me, I bet several MupT members that within a week of your initiation of conversation with me that I could get you to blame me for your imminent quitting of E4. Have you done that too? I knew it wouldn't happen until you lost some units, but now you're probably due for a quitting self-inspection and a blaming of it on others. Am I right there too?

Back to the topic at hand, neither off, nor topic are big words requiring a thesaurus.

And, yes, you describe exactly what you did with the relics. What you leave out is the fact Prr would have had no relics and Prr wouldn't have had the ability to come up for new relics had you not gotten NANC to delay us. Only after ALL their troops had died did you rush in to the rescue.

Just in time to take their relic and the neutral one.

Fortunate for you it was the holiday season for us, or you'd have died there . NANC has a legitimate point though. After they step up to help you, had you turned around and assured their losses were offset by not losing a relic, you'd have proven yourselves both honorable and ally worthy.

Keeping everything for yourself was selfish.

How did NANC help us? We requested their help during the initial invasion and got nothing...at all. NANC didnt do ANYTHING until they were threatened directly.

So we relocated far away from the battle while you guys roamed around NA doing whatever you were doing. Then once you decided to attack NANC, NANC put up a decent fight and then HANDED over the relics in order to save their colonies.

So NANC wants a relic back that they GAVE to MupT? Somebody explain to me how this works...

We didn't take anything from NANC that they didnt already hand over to the enemy.

there relic is still prr's so Oluvai ( piggy ) go and get your crytals back and your conquers

dont let your wallet do the work but your head and hands for skills:)