| Author |
Message |
|
felgrand08
|
Post subject: 4E vs MAD  Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 3:27 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:29 am
Posts: 447
Gender: male
|
_________________
IGN-Seth of Diehard/MADGOD
Current alliances-none
Former alliacnes-EA,LOZ,ZN,SF,VAL,MAD,BoS,KWP
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Hitmo
|
Post subject: Re: 4E vs MAD Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 4:59 am |
|
Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 1:51 am
Posts: 1215
Location: India
Gender: male
|
|
seth what abt ur member being conquered by 4E?
no BRs there?
_________________
^Credit goes to Andy! Thanks!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
felgrand08
|
Post subject: Re: 4E vs MAD Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 5:45 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:29 am
Posts: 447
Gender: male
|
|
No, thats what started the war. They hit a guy who hadnt even built up. They didnt kill anything.
_________________
IGN-Seth of Diehard/MADGOD
Current alliances-none
Former alliacnes-EA,LOZ,ZN,SF,VAL,MAD,BoS,KWP
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Slinkybd
|
Post subject: Re: 4E vs MAD Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:51 am |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 1182
|
|
Thats a poor performance from the winning side.
_________________
BoS (E4) NUKE (Fantasy)
Retired NEWS Reporter.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
felgrand08
|
Post subject: Re: 4E vs MAD Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 3:19 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:29 am
Posts: 447
Gender: male
|
Slinkybd wrote: Thats a poor performance from the winning side. The winner had a smaller army.
_________________
IGN-Seth of Diehard/MADGOD
Current alliances-none
Former alliacnes-EA,LOZ,ZN,SF,VAL,MAD,BoS,KWP
|
|
| Top |
|
|
flint98
|
Post subject: Re: 4E vs MAD Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 4:56 pm |
|
| Corporal |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:17 pm
Posts: 49
|
|
| Top |
|
|
felgrand08
|
Post subject: Re: 4E vs MAD Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 5:26 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:29 am
Posts: 447
Gender: male
|
flint98 wrote: guess RoFL won lol why would you say that?
_________________
IGN-Seth of Diehard/MADGOD
Current alliances-none
Former alliacnes-EA,LOZ,ZN,SF,VAL,MAD,BoS,KWP
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Slinkybd
|
Post subject: Re: 4E vs MAD Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 5:53 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 1182
|
felgrand08 wrote: Slinkybd wrote: Thats a poor performance from the winning side. The winner had a smaller army. Take another moment to re-read that br. Your army costs more to make than theres in terms of oil and metal. Also your initial experience was x10 of theres. They had a couple more "units" however your army was the larger in terms of how many resources were needed to create it.
_________________
BoS (E4) NUKE (Fantasy)
Retired NEWS Reporter.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
felgrand08
|
Post subject: Re: 4E vs MAD Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:07 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:29 am
Posts: 447
Gender: male
|
Slinkybd wrote: felgrand08 wrote: Slinkybd wrote: Thats a poor performance from the winning side. The winner had a smaller army. Take another moment to re-read that br. Your army costs more to make than theres in terms of oil and metal. Also your initial experience was x10 of theres. They had a couple more "units" however your army was the larger in terms of how many resources were needed to create it. And i also walked away with units, and they didnt. In a war where the enemy alliance has more power, and win is crucial. And i have already proven that i will rebuild faster than they will. So everytime i kill one of them, its a member dead. Where as i am just out of the fight for half a day.
_________________
IGN-Seth of Diehard/MADGOD
Current alliances-none
Former alliacnes-EA,LOZ,ZN,SF,VAL,MAD,BoS,KWP
|
|
| Top |
|
|
flint98
|
Post subject: Re: 4E vs MAD Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:25 pm |
|
| Corporal |
|
|
|
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:17 pm
Posts: 49
|
felgrand08 wrote: flint98 wrote: guess RoFL won lol why would you say that? while you too are trading units almost 1 to 1 ratio RoFL is gaining the whole Eastern area and gaining allies and subs. felgrand08 wrote: Slinkybd wrote: Take another moment to re-read that br. Your army costs more to make than theres in terms of oil and metal. Also your initial experience was x10 of theres. They had a couple more "units" however your army was the larger in terms of how many resources were needed to create it. And i also walked away with units, and they didnt. In a war where the enemy alliance has more power, and win is crucial. And i have already proven that i will rebuild faster than they will. So everytime i kill one of them, its a member dead. Where as i am just out of the fight for half a day. that battle doesnt make much of a difference, chassis advantage. you would have won regardless because of the fact they have 25% less health. That is crutial  doesnt matter if u can outboost them, there is still boost cooldown
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
