Author |
Message |
Jettlag
|
Post subject: Re: Antarcica coalition vs RoL and allies Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 7:30 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 11:28 am Posts: 182
|
Good, hippo was a traitor.
As for us changing sides, well...
First war with RoL, we lost hands down. not arguing that. we ran to asia.
Went to war with DIPL, first opening round, was pretty even. then They became BC's sub and we were forced into being allies.
Then BC told us to relocate to Aussie for protection. I retired shortly after, telling my members to help BC. They obviously didn't, and were to busy trying to take control of DKS. at which point, i was forced to come back. By the time i had come back, BC was already beyond helping. anything we'd have done would have been suicide.
Then we went to AA coalition. And i think the story there has been told.
As for the distance, maybe from your hive to the relic, but i was referring to the width of AA at the point the relic was on, which happens to be one of the thinnest points in AA, which at most, would be 10 ticks to traverse.
_________________ Jett Stone, The Supreme Epic Commander of Fishies <>< M3- ABEL F6- LIS, ABEL E3- DIP, DKS Best rank: 7 Most power: 152 Most crystals: 118
Dont forget the BUNNEH! (\ (\ (^=^) (_(")(")
|
|
Top |
|
Maolain
|
Post subject: Re: Antarcica coalition vs RoL and allies Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 10:17 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 4:41 pm Posts: 232 Location: Chicago Gender: male
|
UF you had no excuse. there was a broadcast out saying what happened. actually, there were at least 2 broadcasts out. yet you blatantly ignored the broadcast and took the relic.
_________________ Maolain Tiger Omega Chainbreaker Mirage Midnight Templar Midnight Shield
retired mentor and a proud member of SoLD
|
|
Top |
|
DeathlyShadows
|
Post subject: Re: Antarcica coalition vs RoL and allies Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 1:31 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:32 am Posts: 56 Location: England Gender: male
|
Jettlag wrote: As for the distance, maybe from your hive to the relic, but i was referring to the width of AA at the point the relic was on, which happens to be one of the thinnest points in AA, which at most, would be 10 ticks to traverse.
AA is still hostile territory, controlled by the 'AA' coalition. To cross into AA we either have to pass from Africa to AA (24 tick attack) or from South America to AA. It would not have been easy to get even a spam from Africa to AA. Bringing troops from South America to AA would have meant a relatively slow push through the AA coalition. So, was it really in a position where we could pick it up? No, it wasn't, not even for a second. Keep telling yourself that Jett, you prove more and more than you have a very limited grasp of the game.
_________________
 Boots... its all about boots...
|
|
Top |
|
Jettlag
|
Post subject: Re: Antarcica coalition vs RoL and allies Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 11:06 am |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 11:28 am Posts: 182
|
Whether or not it was in an easy enough position, isn't what was specified in the deal. it was whether or not it was below the south tip of Africa. it was, we satisfied our end of the deal.
As for it being an easy enough grab for RoL, your telling me, the rank 1 alliance, can't move in 10 ticks in AA, to grab a relic, which is well beyond, the hives of the AA coalition, and at the edge of their main territory?
And lets not forget, Hippo back stabbed us both. I think your just trying to say we didn't satisfy our part of the deal, and we did.
Lets not forget, the deal was that:
We place the relic below Africa for RoL to take. RoL marks us blue, until then, we're considered hostile.
How far below Africa, is not mentioned, it was never "in the ocean below africa" it was just "below africa" which, it was.
You pulled a loop-hole on me, well heres RoL's train of thought right back at you.
(i love how, almost every reasoning RoL has used, i've thrown back in their faces to back up my own reasoning, and if they say its an invalid reason, then they're reasoning, is invalid, and they're hypocrites)
_________________ Jett Stone, The Supreme Epic Commander of Fishies <>< M3- ABEL F6- LIS, ABEL E3- DIP, DKS Best rank: 7 Most power: 152 Most crystals: 118
Dont forget the BUNNEH! (\ (\ (^=^) (_(")(")
|
|
Top |
|
voelender999
|
Post subject: Re: Antarcica coalition vs RoL and allies Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 11:19 am |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:47 pm Posts: 11
|
Maolain wrote: UF you had no excuse. there was a broadcast out saying what happened. actually, there were at least 2 broadcasts out. yet you blatantly ignored the broadcast and took the relic. we dont need any excuse for this. We do not let RoL take any relic that easy. Also DKS was sitting this era out. they were not going to war with anyone. so why should we bother? In my position you would do the same.
|
|
Top |
|
DeathlyShadows
|
Post subject: Re: Antarcica coalition vs RoL and allies Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 12:53 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:32 am Posts: 56 Location: England Gender: male
|
Jettlag wrote: Whether or not it was in an easy enough position, isn't what was specified in the deal. it was whether or not it was below the south tip of Africa. it was, we satisfied our end of the deal.
I never said you broke the deal... Jettlag wrote: As for it being an easy enough grab for RoL, your telling me, the rank 1 alliance, can't move in 10 ticks in AA, to grab a relic, which is well beyond, the hives of the AA coalition, and at the edge of their main territory?
Once more you prove how poor your grasp of the game is. To fly from Africa to AA is 24 ticks attack, theres no room to plant our own OP and even then its still 12 ticks. The AA side of the Africa/AA cross over is still firmly in the 'Coalitions' control. Jettlag wrote: And lets not forget, Hippo back stabbed us both. I think your just trying to say we didn't satisfy our part of the deal, and we did.
Lets not forget, the deal was that:
We place the relic below Africa for RoL to take. RoL marks us blue, until then, we're considered hostile.
How far below Africa, is not mentioned, it was never "in the ocean below africa" it was just "below africa" which, it was.
You pulled a loop-hole on me, well heres RoL's train of thought right back at you.
You're creating a phantom argument, we never said you broke the deal... Jettlag wrote: (i love how, almost every reasoning RoL has used, i've thrown back in their faces to back up my own reasoning, and if they say its an invalid reason, then they're reasoning, is invalid, and they're hypocrites) Keep blowing your own trumpet kid  We're all very impressed.
_________________
 Boots... its all about boots...
|
|
Top |
|
AnitsuEx
|
Post subject: Re: Antarcica coalition vs RoL and allies Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 12:56 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:20 pm Posts: 1275
|
Hippo may have "backstabbed" DKS, Jett. However, he didn't do anything towards DKS, but get kicked really, and have his crystals taken by DKS. Hippo didn't spam your ops, hippo didn't attack you guys, in the end he was still going to attack us, which means he is worth more value to the AA coalition than DKS itself as none of them wanted to fight. Pro KoD is Pro; 
_________________ 【Wins】 - 【12】 【Earth】【RoL】【RoL】【SoTF】【DoP】 【Mars】 【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【COPS】【DRAW】 【Fantasy】【EB】【Wolf】
|
|
Top |
|
Jettlag
|
Post subject: Re: Antarcica coalition vs RoL and allies Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 4:45 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 11:28 am Posts: 182
|
If i'm creating a phantom argument, then why are you saying we didn't fulfill the deal? thats what i'm hearing.
And hippo did back stab DKS. he disobeyed orders, attacked an ally (which, at this point RoL is considered allies to DKS even if RoL has us hostile still) and moved the relic to a position other then the one i told him.
As for my grasp of the game, i'm saying 10 ticks to refer to the width of AA at that point, not the distance from africa, to AA. i already stated this.
And you weren't part of the AA coalition were you? i know where they have an iron grip, and where they don't they may have a lot of OPs there, but that doesn't mean anything.
And for blowing my own trumpet, well wouldn't you say i'm tossing RoL's arguments back at them?
RoL member says he'd rather be a winning prostitute, then a losing gentlemen, i use the same argument about DKS running all era.
RoL member says It was not breaking the deal, because they were not attacking DKS, and the deal never specified not getting an ally to attack DKS. i use the same argument that the deal didn't specify where the relic had to be, as long as it was below africa, not how far below africa.
_________________ Jett Stone, The Supreme Epic Commander of Fishies <>< M3- ABEL F6- LIS, ABEL E3- DIP, DKS Best rank: 7 Most power: 152 Most crystals: 118
Dont forget the BUNNEH! (\ (\ (^=^) (_(")(")
|
|
Top |
|
Maolain
|
Post subject: Re: Antarcica coalition vs RoL and allies Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 5:48 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 4:41 pm Posts: 232 Location: Chicago Gender: male
|
Milanor actually hippo was spamming our OPs
_________________ Maolain Tiger Omega Chainbreaker Mirage Midnight Templar Midnight Shield
retired mentor and a proud member of SoLD
|
|
Top |
|
DeathlyShadows
|
Post subject: Re: Antarcica coalition vs RoL and allies Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 1:47 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:32 am Posts: 56 Location: England Gender: male
|
Jettlag wrote: If i'm creating a phantom argument, then why are you saying we didn't fulfill the deal? thats what i'm hearing.
Any evidence? lol. You always talk, but you've never got anything to back it up. Jettlag wrote: And hippo did back stab DKS. he disobeyed orders, attacked an ally (which, at this point RoL is considered allies to DKS even if RoL has us hostile still) and moved the relic to a position other then the one i told him.
As for my grasp of the game, i'm saying 10 ticks to refer to the width of AA at that point, not the distance from africa, to AA. i already stated this.
And you weren't part of the AA coalition were you? i know where they have an iron grip, and where they don't they may have a lot of OPs there, but that doesn't mean anything.
My sat scans show me ALOT of AA coalition OPs, theres no room for me to move across that gap. I could send a spam, sure, but it would only die. Or, i could send me entire army, after flying it back from South America to Africa, then sending it on a 24 tick attack where ANYTHING could be waiting for me at the end. Jettlag wrote: And for blowing my own trumpet, well wouldn't you say i'm tossing RoL's arguments back at them?
RoL member says he'd rather be a winning prostitute, then a losing gentlemen, i use the same argument about DKS running all era.
RoL member says It was not breaking the deal, because they were not attacking DKS, and the deal never specified not getting an ally to attack DKS. i use the same argument that the deal didn't specify where the relic had to be, as long as it was below africa, not how far below africa. DeathlyShadows wrote: Keep blowing your own trumpet kid  We're all very impressed
_________________
 Boots... its all about boots...
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|

|