Isn't letting BDA into the UAC going overboard already? I thought the UAC was made to take complete control of Asia(I'm probably wrong about that because you guys have way more control than just Asia). I would hate to see more alliances join the UAC because they are already too powerful and too big

they need more becuz they are cowards and scarred someone might rise up and be strong enough to take one or two of them

no we keep adding more just to see the rest of u complain about us being to strong or "cowardly" and the UAC added BDA because we want to stretch our boundaries.

lol way to try and make a counter arguement. Im not even on E1, but i can tell, cowards will win this era.

I beg to differ, when it comes to war, cowards protect themselves and dont sacrifice their units for the good of the alliance, cowards always fall in battle(at least the alliance does, some cowards might run to another alliance)

what im trying to say is the alliances in this "coalition" are afraid to fight for themselves. They must have other alliances to help them.

and what im saying is that they wont win

Yes, we are cowards for now. But, sooner or later, somebody is going to snap out of it and prevail, whoever that turns out to be, good for them. However, it's kinda dumb to call people cowards when your not even on the server they are on Apollo.

Speed

What does me not being on the server have to do with it? The alliances refuse to fight their own wars. They are cowards. Since when has BD become all about winning?

It hasn't, or at least I think it hasn't (i'm only on the forum so often). We will fight wars at some point, but for now, like every other era that has been played in the past, it seems much more logical to side with a few alliances and grow, laugh, and prosper, than pick battles with everybody and go down in the first 1000 ticks.