| Author |
Message |
|
Dylan102
|
Post subject: Re: HAHA, HEHE vs IN, WR  Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 9:45 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:36 pm
Posts: 351
Location: New Zealand
Gender: male
|
aazaadx wrote: p0kem0n wrote: Tiffany1schoolgal wrote: HeHe have 80+ squads in AA. WR have 240 squads in iceland. This is gonna be interesting. ye we do only have 80+ squards in AA  btw u just lost your units  ehh BTW heard you just lost 300 + jeeps. Same thing that will make you laugh will make you cry. eheh Correction: It wasn't you. It was two those genius sub players from huhu. Filled with experienced players that cant aspire for any anything more except to be a sub. No pun intended woot  Lol this come from guy that got trapped by HuHu and will lose 56 squads?  
_________________
MGH - OS - SPAM - COPS - Nam - TLD - DUMB - KnaW - TTM - SoTF - KOOL - HAHA
|
|
| Top |
|
|
riski1234567dr
|
Post subject: Re: HAHA, HEHE vs IN, WR Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 9:55 pm |
|
| Private |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:58 am
Posts: 0
Gender: male
|
|
He hasn't lost them until he's lost them.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Dylan102
|
Post subject: Re: HAHA, HEHE vs IN, WR Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 10:10 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:36 pm
Posts: 351
Location: New Zealand
Gender: male
|
apollo wrote: He hasn't lost them until he's lost them. I would like to see him beat 200 squads, Surprise me
_________________
MGH - OS - SPAM - COPS - Nam - TLD - DUMB - KnaW - TTM - SoTF - KOOL - HAHA
|
|
| Top |
|
|
tellerofpointedstones
|
Post subject: Re: HAHA, HEHE vs IN, WR Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:55 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:25 pm
Posts: 2445
|
apollo wrote: tellerofpointedstones wrote: Im hardly bothering about E1 now  In fact, Im hardly bothering about BD now. IS Teller admitting that he's tiffany?
_________________
Socialite. Has-been.
No matter how long I have been gone, my heart will lead me back here.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
p0kem0n
|
Post subject: Re: HAHA, HEHE vs IN, WR Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:26 am |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 12
Gender: male
|
Dylan102 wrote: apollo wrote: He hasn't lost them until he's lost them. I would like to see him beat 200 squads, Surprise me 200 squards where u get does numbers from ? its more like 400 squards ...
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Dylan102
|
Post subject: Re: HAHA, HEHE vs IN, WR Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:57 am |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:36 pm
Posts: 351
Location: New Zealand
Gender: male
|
p0kem0n wrote: Dylan102 wrote: apollo wrote: He hasn't lost them until he's lost them. I would like to see him beat 200 squads, Surprise me 200 squards where u get does numbers from ? its more like 400 squards ... well at the time i posted its like 200... but since then a lot more have been sent xD only two more ticks before he dies
_________________
MGH - OS - SPAM - COPS - Nam - TLD - DUMB - KnaW - TTM - SoTF - KOOL - HAHA
|
|
| Top |
|
|
aazaadx
|
Post subject: Re: HAHA, HEHE vs IN, WR Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:38 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:27 am
Posts: 269
Location: 1 ETA
Gender: male
|
|
Wouldn't be the first time I lost my army, I wouldn't dare to say it would be the last.
If only I could be as skilled a player as you and not ever lose my army.
Just to reiterate the quote you presented. "Filled with experienced players (or mufti's) that cant aspire for any anything more except to be a sub". It just baffles me that anyone would want to be a sub for anyone else. Though this seems to be common practice now. ARM and GIFT both had subs to win an era, and now of course HAHA. As if they could not do it by themselves. It seem now that not skill, activity and unfortunately deep pockets is what makes an alliance great. But how many ladies they can get to be meat shields.
I would like to say all those kinds of players are sorry and take away from the dynamics of the game. I think their is an alliance cap for a reason. I would like to hear from some experienced players why this is acceptable behavior. And at least why a strong leader would resort to such tactics. Can they/you not do it on your own? I would like to see it where everyone is trying to win.
_________________
This game sucks; you have been fore warned.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
M.I.A
|
Post subject: Re: HAHA, HEHE vs IN, WR Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:42 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:42 am
Posts: 65
Gender: male
|
aazaadx wrote: Correction: It wasn't you. It was two those genius sub players from huhu. Filled with experienced players that cant aspire for any anything more except to be a sub. No pun intended woot Lol this come from guy that got trapped by HuHu and will lose 56 squads? [/quote] Wouldn't be the first time I lost my army, I wouldn't dare to say it would be the last. If only I could be as skilled a player as you and not ever lose my army. Just to reiterate the quote you presented. "Filled with experienced players (or mufti's) that cant aspire for any anything more except to be a sub". It just baffles me that anyone would want to be a sub for anyone else. Though this seems to be common practice now. ARM and GIFT both had subs to win an era, and now of course HAHA. As if they could not do it by themselves. It seem now that not skill, activity and unfortunately deep pockets is what makes an alliance great. But how many ladies they can get to be meat shields. I would like to say all those kinds of players are sorry and take away from the dynamics of the game. I think their is an alliance cap for a reason. I would like to hear from some experienced players why this is acceptable behavior. And at least why a strong leader would resort to such tactics. Can they/you not do it on your own? I would like to see it where everyone is trying to win.[/quote] WR2, WR3, WR4, WR5. Not to mention IN, INN, IN2 and WDH helping you guys out. - Missing In Action.
_________________
Leader of AS1N, E1A4
Leader of NE, E1A6
NATO, E1A3
ASEN, E1A5
V, M1A2
DE, M1A6
ICE E1A16
MIA of Whatever
|
|
| Top |
|
|
zach15
|
Post subject: Re: HAHA, HEHE vs IN, WR Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:43 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 6:13 pm
Posts: 704
Gender: male
|
|
look at IN.... they need WR to win :O
Just like how they needed WIC last era
|
|
| Top |
|
|
aazaadx
|
Post subject: Re: HAHA, HEHE vs IN, WR Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:57 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:27 am
Posts: 269
Location: 1 ETA
Gender: male
|
|
I am saying why is this acceptable in general as a whole.
There are some differences. HAHA is premeditated subbing. Meaning intentionally boosting their rosters to help them win.
WR and IN, either one had their own intentions on winning. One alliance competing for the number one spot. Neither one came or negotiated to this day to help the other win over themselves. WdH wasnt even seriously playing this round and had no intention of helping anyone win. They did not even get involved until 3 subs attacked IN. They have no particular allegiance to anyone winning. WR had subs that were recruited randomly from players ( I did not say this is right).
So your saying it is acceptable to sub. The best alliance goes to the leader that can recruit the best subs? Still evades the question. Can they not do it on their own?
How did IN need WIC?
I did say I would like to hear from experienced players you know. But you are free to comment.
_________________
This game sucks; you have been fore warned.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
