Forum rules
1.) No trolling. If you cant have fun without being a jerk to others, find some other forum to QQ
2.) No inappropriate/vulgar/sexually explicit posting. Staff reserves the right to deem anything they see fit as inappropriate.
3.) Have fun and don't post anything not geared at having fun!
4.) Please respect staff members and their decisions at all times. If you cannot accept a staff or moderator decision, please appeal to admin Seth.
| Author |
Message |
|
ThyLastPenguin
|
Post subject: Re: WKRH - Day Round 1  Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:26 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:06 pm
Posts: 39
|
ghossfeld88 wrote: vaultdweller101 wrote: TheCallum wrote: Fine Sirs, I would like to stress that my position is of utmost discomfort rather than of murderous intent!
And to retort to the accusation that I was 'too quick' to accuse, surely if I was a guilty party I would strive NOT to seem guilty and would wait for others to accuse before I followed suit? Your logic is wierd. Well, it might be exactly for this behavior that you are one of the culprits! You know that responding too quickly could be suspitious, and that you could use this argument to defend yourself when you actually did respond the first! Plus, if you really are guilty, you would know what targets to fire at, and speaking the first would land you the best possibilities of gathering other people to agree with you, and lynch an innocent person! Simply put, if you are the first to point at someone, youre almost bound to have other people to agree, just because that person was the first target. Now, for our logic being "weird": didn't you yourself just say that guilty people usually post the firsts? And yet you post first, then you say our logic is weird for pointing at you as a culprit? You are even contradicting yourself in an effort of looking innocent, something right now I have prevented you of doing. Actually, I have even more conviction that you are indeed, one of the bad guys! LYNCH CALLUM!!! Agreed lynch Callum You, could sir seem to have a vendetta against callum, but you also seem to be lacking in long messages to hint for us your reasons. Could this be that you are, in fact, trying to point us away from you, but also without making yourself very noticable? I say we lynch this 'ere murderer. Yes. I called you a murderer. For i speak the truth*. *disclaimer. Thylastpenguin does not in fact know what the word truth means, so please take it with a pinch of salt.
_________________
~Dan's Un-Official B*tch~
*Yao ming*
|
|
| Top |
|
|
ghossfeld88
|
Post subject: Re: WKRH - Day Round 1 Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:29 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 6:42 pm
Posts: 539
Gender: male
|
|
No I just never played this game before and thought what VD said was logical.
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Xeru
|
Post subject: Re: WKRH - Day Round 1 Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:31 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:58 am
Posts: 309
Location: Mmhm...
|
|
LYNCH TENKAI
wait.
_________________
Liam wrote: Rise my minions, VOTE FERR3T #1 FOR HEAD MOD!!
Simmen wrote: How are you not a admin Hal?..
|
|
| Top |
|
|
vaultdweller101
|
Post subject: Re: WKRH - Day Round 1 Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:31 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 8:04 pm
Posts: 269
Location: Behind you!
|
|
Anyone's claim is valid at this first post. Yet I am merely giving my reasons why I think Callum could be one of the murderers: I just recommend you read through them, then think if theyre objective or not. I do think I am being VERY noticeable up to this point: going vocal on the first day sure will bring me some heat, but I did think pointing those things out would be benefitial for the entire game. Yet no, I have no personal vendetta against Callum, but half-assed answers and comebacks to my pointings will receive even harsher pointings. If a better candidate than Callum for murderer comes by, I would surely vote for him/her, but for now I say Callum is my prime suspect.
_________________
Special thanks to Aister for the siggy!!!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Xeru
|
Post subject: Re: WKRH - Day Round 1 Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:35 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:58 am
Posts: 309
Location: Mmhm...
|
|
Vault have you played mafia before?
_________________
Liam wrote: Rise my minions, VOTE FERR3T #1 FOR HEAD MOD!!
Simmen wrote: How are you not a admin Hal?..
|
|
| Top |
|
|
vaultdweller101
|
Post subject: Re: WKRH - Day Round 1 Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:41 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 8:04 pm
Posts: 269
Location: Behind you!
|
No, actually. I would ha dloved to tho 
_________________
Special thanks to Aister for the siggy!!!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Lolowut
|
Post subject: Re: WKRH - Day Round 1 Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:43 pm |
|
| Private |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2020 8:33 am
Posts: 0
Gender: male
|
You can also vote No Lynch. Just.. Btw 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Xeru
|
Post subject: Re: WKRH - Day Round 1 Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:45 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:58 am
Posts: 309
Location: Mmhm...
|
why the hell are you pushing so hard for a RVP vote (for your benefit http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Random_Vote) Your posts are actually borderline ridiculous. There is no information behind your lynch, so why the heck would you /actually/ try to push for a successful lynch? Be thankful though, you're not the worst scum in this game. Ghoss would have to be the most blatantly stupid wagoner I've seen in any mafia game, ever. A stupid push for lynch in RVP is scummy, but wagoning on is beyond scum. Lynch ghoss
_________________
Liam wrote: Rise my minions, VOTE FERR3T #1 FOR HEAD MOD!!
Simmen wrote: How are you not a admin Hal?..
|
|
| Top |
|
|
ghossfeld88
|
Post subject: Re: WKRH - Day Round 1 Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:48 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 6:42 pm
Posts: 539
Gender: male
|
|
I am probably the worst mafia game player I just started and thought the first one to say something is it. Right? I also dont really know who to pick so I just agreed with VD
P.S. Where is Tenkai?
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
|
vaultdweller101
|
Post subject: Re: WKRH - Day Round 1 Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:51 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 8:04 pm
Posts: 269
Location: Behind you!
|
|
...No information? I am merely saying to lynch Collum, because his defense to my first post voting for him to be lynched was contradictory. I do believe I still have the power to change my vote anytime I wish. And well, to admit the truth, Ive never played a game like this, so Im merely doign what I can with the regular logic I always use for this area of problems. Which is extremely limited. Still, why can I not point at someone to be lynched because his defense to my first accusation was very weak?
_________________
Special thanks to Aister for the siggy!!!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
