My bad, I wasn't very clear on that part. I've been in eras with alliances like DG and SoL where they have, like you said, dominated, with both skill and tokens. I have seen this domination of eras over a long period of time, so I understand the fact that we have been recently playing in eras where the highest paying customer wins the era.

What I should have said was "complete domination". Eras where as soon as all the relics are released, no one puts up a fight. At least now, we have those alliances with a decent enough power who have a chance to put a dent into the larger alliances. I'm just saying that this pattern will be completely nonexistent with this mandate in the far future. For now, we won't feel much, but there won't be much of a point in playing once the top winning alliances will have all the tokens.

I disagree with this. As a player who doesn't boost reds, i am quite limited, and no matter how much activity and strategy I use, there's almost always a red booster who can simply buy first place ahead of me. With tokens being rewarded to 2nd and 3rd, i still have a chance to make the eras worth my time so i can at least recoup the blues i spent. Please continue tokens for 2nd and 3rd.

-Adam

seems that most ppl that dont like this change are pointing to the fact that the top boosters are the main problem here , its a total different can of worms if you ask me , and i agree that something needs to be done to even that out and this is what they tried to do with this 2nd 3rd blue tokens deal but it's done the game more harm than good so they gotta retract it and come at it from a different angle , or at least thats the way i see it .
at least this way we got the main boosters focused on killing each other , thats what im liking , instead of them all grouping up and killing the world and taking 1-3rd every round like its been a going

i say just take out third and keep second but lower the second place amount to about the same as 3rd and i agree with increasing first too

I understand what you are trying to say, and I essentially agree. What we should be concerned about is the equality gap between the top players, those in the middle, and the rookies. This new mandate won't impact this equality gap immediately, but it will in the far future. Something should be done that better shrinks this equality gap, and this mandate will make it worse once the negatives take place.

I wish there was a non boost era as well

i feel like the rain man * yep definetly a gap definetly a gap !!!

their working on a master plan bro , this one didnt work , they'll try something else , no worrys

You are just making a reason so the BLUE TOKENS will be lessen...

I SAY NO!

Rank 3 alliances should have those blue tokens and stop doing this just to get on top...

Plus there is still good wars showing so don't do this -_-

I think this is still not effective considering the fact tht i help my friends without any incentive of second or third. The people with friends like me, will continue having 2-3 teams regardless of the token incentive so i think there will still be alliances tht endure "battlehugs" if u will. However, most of the other worlds might be more competitive as a result. Only time will tell