it's not proving wrong... they are all expanded. Each new theories are based on the previous ones, and improve it to fit with the current knowledge about the world.

you can tell that.......

but i tell you really.....

Raman effect had no previous theories...

Only wave nature was proved by broglie... Newton's ray nature of light wasnt found to be applicable everywhere...

Its all about impove to fit better... and if you really cant suggest something which is totally new and explains.. the phenomenon better..

Like Bohr did with... Rutherford' Model of Atom...
And then came the the modern theory of Atom...

We havent and cant expect one to change the whole thing like a fairy tale...

THe model atomic world consists of contributions from planck, bohr, broglies, schrondinger, Fermi, and all... there are some i didnt name...

ONly three great individuals were involved in Almost every sceintific formula' derviations(atlest most of them)...

They are Newton, Eistein... and who was the other... well there was one...

I was surprised to run into Newton everyone in my textbook... and EIstein is all the way after.....

Sadly today's textbooks dont mention detail into modern science

Like in 5th grade we thought only sunlight is used for photosynthesis... and we came to know 6 years later any light is good enough....

As we go deeper, we know we were misinstructed... not because it was text's fault... just cuz it was easier to not involve all those...

Now here comes my first... errr to an end......

So where's God in this.... God is all about belief... I m repeating you can chose to believe, not just cause there's some holy bible says it does.... and poor Copernicus was executed due to the Bible...

If Bible says there is god , I cant absolutely believe it....

I believe my consceience to be my God to show the rit way....

Miracles.... well those happen cuz we ne'er give up......

well said, theories are not just conjecture or guesses or wild stabs in the dark, a scientific theory is always based on fact and can be invalidated only with facts.


first of all. THIS IS MY COLOUR D:<
shoo.

regarding my signature -its a humourous gist. a play on the philosophical idea that with an omniscient, omnipotent god, there is no free will as god would have created the universe knowing full well the course of events including your choices, at the time, he created this universe while knowing this info thus removing the possibility of free will. (abridged version)
obviously god doesnt make me an atheist, i dont believe in god, doesnt make the claim any less witty.

earth was created via accretion in a particle rich early solar system. BBT is indirectly related to the formation of earth.

BBT (big bang theory) is supported by cosmic microwave background radiation, redshift demonstrating an expanding universe, elemental abundance as well as star and gas distribution.

it doesnt explain where the universe came from, only how the universe came to be.


oh and Jaden-
PLUM PUDDING MODEL FOR THE WIN. ONLY HERETICS SAY OTHERWISE

rutherford is a heretic notioning otherwise!

oh a thompson lover...

or just another pudding lover......

i think its all jumbled up now.... IOW there are no sides

theres no real your fake...

tell me are you real or fake?
you can mail me your id, photo proof everthing... I will suggest its your ghost...

you cant prove me wrong unless you ask for my proof....

*changes name to Side: Real or Jake...

lol jake your a mod your turning a "debate" thread into spam