Author |
Message |
Gaurav
|
Post subject: Re: The Asian Coalition Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:15 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:00 pm Posts: 687 Gender: male
|
Filters are doing their job. However, may I ask you to refrain from posting while in your current condition.
Thank you, -Gaurav
_________________ Championship Era 2013 Winner (DoCE/VND) FORMER SENIOR MODERATOR 8+ years of Battledawn
|
|
Top |
|
Vincent
|
Post subject: Re: The Asian Coalition Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:28 am |
|
Corporal |
|
|
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:09 am Posts: 50 Gender: male
|
well thats ok im sober now, a few minutes made all the difference, specially since i changed to my forum username, it sobered me right up, i guess it didnt help that the chick i had here just left after i spent more time with BD then i did with her. Anyhow, what was i talking about again? Oh yeah, i just wanted to annouced i just took out a BDA member that was in the middle of my way, he was alone and unpretected around asia/europe and the BR was 83- 17, and since we are neutral i took him out, this isnt a declation a war to BDA, as i wouldnt dare attack their home base, but this guy was in the middle of nowhere like any other conquer i got after, so i simply conquered him
|
|
Top |
|
edwin737
|
Post subject: Re: The Asian Coalition Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 9:16 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:33 pm Posts: 735 Location: fantasy Gender: male
|
|
Top |
|
Andrew
|
Post subject: Re: The Asian Coalition Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:44 pm |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:23 pm Posts: 925 Location: Ontario, Canada Gender: male
|
No actually I have a player account for testing features in the OE alliance . Nothing against UAC, I'll follow Ant59's decisions as I would any leader, just saying that I'm not a fan of being in a coalition with big alliances. If you are a big alliance you shouldn't need other big alliances to gang up on smaller ones, smaller fish should team up to take on bigger fish, not the other way around .
-Andrew
_________________ Ex-
|
|
Top |
|
cbuzz24
|
Post subject: Re: The Asian Coalition Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:54 pm |
|
Corporal |
|
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:00 pm Posts: 77 Gender: male
|
Well said, Andrew. Simple and to the point.
|
|
Top |
|
Lord of War
|
Post subject: Re: The Asian Coalition Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:59 am |
|
Private 1st class |
|
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 11:19 pm Posts: 18 Gender: male
|
What can I say... Ugh - about sums it up.
Oh and let me add this - Ugh!
24 members in an alliance and you people still feel the need to make subs and coalitions - its mind-boggling.
Group your colonies together and defend them. Then pick a target and attack them. If another alliance starts getting close then find out if they are hostile to you - determine whether they are telling the truth and act accordingly.
Please - stop being lame - Subs/Coalitions are all lame. If you're are in a coalition you are being lame. Make war - not love.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
Maniac
|
Post subject: Re: The Asian Coalition Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 4:44 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:53 am Posts: 70 Gender: male
|
Well said Andrew - you made the point better than I did. The scenario that Knight described to me involved uniting at least 4 of the top 8 alliances. I just don't see the point in that ! [quote="Andrew"][color=green]If you are a big alliance you shouldn't need other big alliances to gang up on smaller ones, smaller fish should team up to take on bigger fish, not the other way around .
_________________ E4 KOA - BUL5 E4 Fozzie Bear - The Muppets E1 Juggernaut - The Xavier Institute E1 Mo of KOA - The Fighting 69th E3-A5 Mo of Kingdom of Armagh - ARM E3-A6 Barney Gumble - The Simpsons
|
|
Top |
|
redwurm
|
Post subject: Re: The Asian Coalition Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 4:49 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:00 pm Posts: 799 Location: Ohio Gender: male
|
Lord of War wrote: What can I say... Ugh - about sums it up.
Oh and let me add this - Ugh!
24 members in an alliance and you people still feel the need to make subs and coalitions - its mind-boggling.
Group your colonies together and defend them. Then pick a target and attack them. If another alliance starts getting close then find out if they are hostile to you - determine whether they are telling the truth and act accordingly.
Please - stop being lame - Subs/Coalitions are all lame. If you're are in a coalition you are being lame. Make war - not love. Quoted for reiteration.
_________________ mL / AI / Prr / ROTR / Meow / KM
Oluvai wrote: There is no clue boost. bfan8475 wrote: If i cant put up better comebacks to your insults then its called bullying since i cant put up a fight
|
|
Top |
|
edwin737
|
Post subject: Re: The Asian Coalition Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:30 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:33 pm Posts: 735 Location: fantasy Gender: male
|
|
Top |
|
Bazzy
|
Post subject: Re: The Asian Coalition Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 11:53 am |
|
First Lieutenant |
|
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:04 pm Posts: 565 Gender: male
|
God..... I thought left coalitions behind in E6, guess I was wrong. I mean honestly..... a coalition and 2 subs. You do realize that's a 72 member alliance if you include the subs..... I thought people wouldn't form subs with double the alliance members, especially not when they're in first place. But I guess I'm just crazy
_________________
I can't play for CRAP
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|