Author |
Message |
edwin737
|
Post subject: Re: Client Updates - Sunday June 14th, 2009 Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 8:55 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:33 pm Posts: 735 Location: fantasy Gender: male
|
|
Top |
|
Knight of Zero
|
Post subject: Re: Client Updates - Sunday June 14th, 2009 Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 9:12 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:43 pm Posts: 360
|
yea but thats 25 ticks of resources im losing. and since im losing about 40 metal a turn thats 1000 metal i just lost out on. thats a range and an armor tank i could have had
_________________
KoZ is back with a brand new pack!
|
|
Top |
|
edwin737
|
Post subject: Re: Client Updates - Sunday June 14th, 2009 Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 9:16 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:33 pm Posts: 735 Location: fantasy Gender: male
|
|
Top |
|
aaron333000
|
Post subject: Re: Client Updates - Sunday June 14th, 2009 Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 9:44 pm |
|
Private |
|
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:37 pm Posts: 1 Gender: male
|
yeah, i lost like 60 metal and so on..... that just is not good.
How about admin, give us a boost on metal and oil production, i mean the ones which have conquered colonies on vacation ???
|
|
Top |
|
edwin737
|
Post subject: Re: Client Updates - Sunday June 14th, 2009 Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 9:46 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:33 pm Posts: 735 Location: fantasy Gender: male
|
|
Top |
|
matriarq
|
Post subject: Re: Client Updates - Sunday June 14th, 2009 Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 9:51 pm |
|
Private |
|
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:10 pm Posts: 3 Gender: male
|
well holmes, its just not cool watching your conquers just sit for twice the ammount.. if they r inactive let us get some for the trouble of conquering them or boot em. I guess the only upside to conquering is the rank cause once the colonies r conquered they go on vacation. lol.. rediculous
|
|
Top |
|
Andrew
|
Post subject: Re: Client Updates - Sunday June 14th, 2009 Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:00 pm |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:23 pm Posts: 925 Location: Ontario, Canada Gender: male
|
300 ticks of uninterrupted and unchallenged taxation from a colony is not enough...?
-Andrew
_________________ Ex-
|
|
Top |
|
Southern_Smoke
|
Post subject: Re: Client Updates - Sunday June 14th, 2009 Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:11 pm |
|
Sergeant |
|
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:01 pm Posts: 82 Gender: male
|
If you conquer a colony and it goes on vacation due to inactivity and you do not get resources for that colony in vacation I think there should at least be some type of bonus for the Conquerer.
my idea would be this:
When a inactive colony gets put into auto vacation mode and gets deleted due to inactivity his or her Conquerer should receive some type of razing bonus and the deleted colony should act as a razed OP with an extra amount of resources and or workers given to the Conquerer.
I think that would balance out right for everybody and i think it would be an idea many would agree with. it would also encourage players to be more active and trying to actually play the game wich would lead to less members even going into auto vacation mode.
_________________ LOZ VETERAN
|
|
Top |
|
TyraelRaven
|
Post subject: Re: Client Updates - Sunday June 14th, 2009 Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:25 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:11 am Posts: 4 Gender: male
|
Southern Smoke's idea does have some appeal, that would at least be better than the current system for auto-vacation and deletion, however, here's the issue:
As one gets conquers and expands his/her positions using the income, his/her expansions are being supported by the income from his/her conquers, whether they are active or inactive. However, if these conquers start hitting the 300-tick mark and one loses that source of income, one's future conquers will simply replace the now-lost income. As such, this will essentially put a limit on the player's ability to become more powerful, and force the player to have to be continually conquering other players in order to just sustain their income.
Further, as the round goes on and the less active, and therefore easier to conquer, players disappear, which leaves less people for one to conquer, and can then leave one to essentially become more or less too big to support, and the player will lose any accomplishment. As such, all but the very best players who conquer the active and competent players will lose their ability to grow in power and scope throughout the game.
Your thoughts, Andrew?
|
|
Top |
|
edwin737
|
Post subject: Re: Client Updates - Sunday June 14th, 2009 Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:52 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:33 pm Posts: 735 Location: fantasy Gender: male
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|