Author |
Message |
Slinkybd
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 6:20 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:20 pm Posts: 1182
|
Idk on eras with no competition and without wars just from killing people who had about 3 mass boosts the whole era I was able to get around 5k kills. It wouldnt be surprising to see you guys with a 12k kill average at such an early stage in the game with 40+ boosts so far But joking aside VND has done a lot, good work guys. Keep it up though the era is far from over!
_________________ BoS (E4) NUKE (Fantasy)

Retired NEWS Reporter.
|
|
Top |
|
bleaky
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 8:56 pm |
|
Corporal |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:46 pm Posts: 77
|
cosmin1980 wrote: One more thing: respect to Edi and Sold for keeping their word and staying neutral. They have power, 2 relics, I am sure everyone in Sage is begging them for help. And yet they keep the word given to their friends at era start. That is a true BD warrior. Hat off to you Thanks Daemon. Calling us true BD warriors is too much of the flattery though, considering we don't even fight  And by the way, SAGE don't beg but ask nicely and they have good reason to do so as we are traditional allies somehow. mfreak wrote: We are just playing the game according to what has been laid out in front of us. Our allies coordinate very well with us, are active and they kick some serious ass. Dont blame us or try to discredit us for it! You brought (or recruited) a large part of the active BD community here to make sure you win this era. It's pathetic that so many players prefer to do your work here instead of going for the win themselves or at least playing as independent alliances. I know things been going similar on other servers recently but I'm sure this kind of abuse makes BD less and less attractive for players looking for a competitive game. That's my last comment on this topic though, I'm actually surprised you guys keep defending yourselves in that matter. Bad conscience?  After all some of the VND players have been rather loud to criticise others for similar behaviour lately.
_________________ Nicknames: s0rcy, Vidar
I am a SoLDier
|
|
Top |
|
lifenstuff
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 9:22 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:55 pm Posts: 1544 Gender: male
|
They are not confident in their skills.
_________________

Apollo wrote: Eh, I try to win every once and awhile. Gotta keep up appearances.
|
|
Top |
|
jdsoccer13
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 10:01 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 3:02 pm Posts: 43
|
You brought (or recruited) a large part of the active BD community here to make sure you win this era. It's pathetic that so many players prefer to do your work here instead of going for the win themselves or at least playing as independent alliances. I know things been going similar on other servers recently but I'm sure this kind of abuse makes BD less and less attractive for players looking for a competitive game. That's my last comment on this topic though, I'm actually surprised you guys keep defending yourselves in that matter. Bad conscience?  After all some of the VND players have been rather loud to criticise others for similar behaviour lately.[/quote] I agree with a lot of what your saying. I understand the aspect of having family alliances in BD, because if you don't have one, someone else will... It would be a lot more fun if everyone battled it out. Although, its not like this is something that has just come around recently.. Even back in the OC, major alliances had families of 4-5 alliances for one era. It was where many players, including myself learned how to play. However, there were usually 3-4 of these families on a single server so there was always wars. I think if BD went back to only giving tokens for a 1st place finish there would be more wars.. and there probably wouldn't be this much teaming up... especially for an era like this.
_________________ IGN's: Soldier of Darkness, Harbinger of Darkness Recent Wins Milk FPM Coming Out FPM
|
|
Top |
|
jdsoccer13
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 10:02 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 3:02 pm Posts: 43
|
BTW, not trying to diss anyone in this war... just stating my opinion on a topic that has been brought up in the thread. 
_________________ IGN's: Soldier of Darkness, Harbinger of Darkness Recent Wins Milk FPM Coming Out FPM
|
|
Top |
|
aister
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 10:40 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:48 am Posts: 7985 Location: Fuyuki City Gender: male
|
jdsoccer13 wrote: I think if BD went back to only giving tokens for a 1st place finish there would be more wars.. and there probably wouldn't be this much teaming up... especially for an era like this. ppl don't play in a sub cuz they are promised a high rank... they played in the subs, most of the time, to help their friends in the main... so I don't think this will solve it...
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
Harvester
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 11:10 pm |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 6:57 pm Posts: 822 Location: Wisconsin, USA Gender: male
|
Why can't people just play for themselves? It would bring lots of life back to this game outside of the CE.
_________________
 Former BattleDawn Moderating Staff Member I can't play for CRAP Alliances of note, OC: TBH, JFA, BYZ, DoG. NC: CRAP, BoB, JFA, BYZ, DoP, CBop.
|
|
Top |
|
jdsoccer13
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 11:59 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 3:02 pm Posts: 43
|
aister wrote: jdsoccer13 wrote: I think if BD went back to only giving tokens for a 1st place finish there would be more wars.. and there probably wouldn't be this much teaming up... especially for an era like this. ppl don't play in a sub cuz they are promised a high rank... they played in the subs, most of the time, to help their friends in the main... so I don't think this will solve it... You can't tell me 5k blues isn't at least somewhat of an incentive to sub for someone else... sure, people play to help each other.. I've done it many times.. but I think it definetly affects all this "handing relics over" crap.. as well as gets people who may be on the fence for helping someone out for an era, play that era..
_________________ IGN's: Soldier of Darkness, Harbinger of Darkness Recent Wins Milk FPM Coming Out FPM
|
|
Top |
|
eragona
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 12:18 am |
|
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 7:30 am Posts: 299 Gender: male
|
jdsoccer13 wrote: BTW, not trying to diss anyone in this war... just stating my opinion on a topic that has been brought up in the thread.  Not playing for tokens m8, But for fun.  Almost all the eras which i saw for last one year had a good amount of supporters for winning teams (u can call it sub /brothers or whatever) The few eras i remember are E1, 1. SoLD and ED faced off? 2. ARM Vs the world (due to CE hype, low competition was on that era) E4 3. BYZ Vs UN E2 4. ALLY Vs SAGE And many more. All the players who played in those alliances are playing in CBop, GML, VND and SAGE and their allies. So blaming one side of having supporters is just no use. This is how BD is atm, More than Individual alliance strength, Good supporters / brother alliances are vital for ur win. Even if u dont have them, ur opposing alliances will. Those who are blaming on having brother alliances/subs here have always done the same on past eras and i am sure they wont disagree with me. Consider if VND hasnt brought any. SAGE will have Fear/ SoTF/RAWR/WWE/Ez + other subs GML will have GML2/GMLx/xGML/GMLa + other subs But VND and allies is fighting the rest of the world atm except SoLD
_________________ Zodiac War does not determine who is right,only who is left.
Currently playing E6- HaHa
|
|
Top |
|
lifenstuff
|
Post subject: Re: SAGE, SoTF, I + affiliates vs VND, BEER, HaHa + affiliates Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 12:33 am |
|
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:55 pm Posts: 1544 Gender: male
|
eragona wrote: jdsoccer13 wrote: BTW, not trying to diss anyone in this war... just stating my opinion on a topic that has been brought up in the thread.  Not playing for tokens m8, But for fun.  Almost all the eras which i saw for last one year had a good amount of supporters for winning teams (u can call it sub /brothers or whatever) The few eras i remember are E1, 1. SoLD and ED faced off? 2. ARM Vs the world (due to CE hype, low competition was on that era) E4 3. BYZ Vs UN E2 4. ALLY Vs SAGE And many more. All the players who played in those alliances are playing in CBop, GML, VND and SAGE and their allies. So blaming one side of having supporters is just no use. This is how BD is atm, More than Individual alliance strength, Good supporters / brother alliances are vital for ur win. Even if u dont have them, ur opposing alliances will. Those who are blaming on having brother alliances/subs here have always done the same on past eras and i am sure they wont disagree with me. Consider if VND hasnt brought any. SAGE will have Fear/ SoTF/RAWR/WWE/Ez + other subs GML will have GML2/GMLx/xGML/GMLa + other subs But VND and allies is fighting the rest of the world atm except SoLD that's the kind of mentality that needs to be gone. oh hey they're going to bring help or they're sure to so we should too. anyways getting back on topic, have big battles happened yet?
_________________

Apollo wrote: Eh, I try to win every once and awhile. Gotta keep up appearances.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|

|