| Author |
Message |
|
generated-KrEc5gbTAqLC-1608557600
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM  Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:43 am |
|
| Private |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2020 8:33 am
Posts: 0
Gender: male
|
|
Not only does Hannibal look halfway decent in a kilt, but he also knows his alphabet as seen above.
Be scared, be very scared.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Milanos
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:01 pm |
|
| Moderator |
 |
|
|
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:13 pm
Posts: 2041
|
|
Well to be fair, the rank difference doesn't say that much. There's only about 200 power difference.
_________________
Won both Championship Eras as rank 1.. Waiting to make it 3 out of 3.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
agonasani
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:02 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:35 pm
Posts: 614
Location: FYRO Macedonia
Gender: male
|
|
especially with all them mass boosts
_________________
BMO chop(If this was a real attack you'd be dead)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
sheepdog5
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:57 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 12:27 am
Posts: 257
|
Milanos wrote: Well to be fair, the rank difference doesn't say that much. There's only about 200 power difference. NOW there is only a 200 difference in power. When the war started there was a 500 difference in power, as I pointed out. But aye in the other respect, rank means SOOO much less this era because of all the mass boosts/players and alliances here. Score is obviously a horrible predictor of actual strength of an alliance, power is slightly better, but still not the best indicator...though it is the best we have.
_________________
CBop - Member/Leader (Champs Era)
JFA - Member (E1 current era)
BYZ - Leader (E4 current era)
Founder, The Byzantine Empire
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Slinkybd
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:58 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 1182
|
|
You keep up the good work bro, you've made this era better than any other war in my opinion.
_________________
BoS (E4) NUKE (Fantasy)
Retired NEWS Reporter.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Milanos
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:07 pm |
|
| Moderator |
|
|
|
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:13 pm
Posts: 2041
|
Ah okay, didn't know it was a 500 power difference at the start of the war, I thought it was less. But yes, CBop is doing very well  The differences in squad counts are just so small this era that you really have to rely on tactics and on activity.. I love it.
_________________
Won both Championship Eras as rank 1.. Waiting to make it 3 out of 3.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Botelharareborn
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:23 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:27 am
Posts: 80
Gender: male
|
|
| Top |
|
|
agonasani
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:25 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:35 pm
Posts: 614
Location: FYRO Macedonia
Gender: male
|
|
......
_________________
BMO chop(If this was a real attack you'd be dead)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Gaurav
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:53 pm |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:00 pm
Posts: 687
Gender: male
|
|
Eh this is a horrible indicator of CHAM players activity and tactics vs CBop. CBop came into the round looking to be active and play seriously for a win. CHAM is made up of all players that were either here to just watch or train fellow friends.
CHAM when it is its usual UN alliance with all members are definitely an alliance to be feared. Most of the CBop guys found that out last E4 when they lost to UN and allies. I am sure CHAM will regroup even this era and I don't think CBop will find that too be as easy as they think this war might be atm.
Still very early in this round and this war.
_________________
Championship Era 2013 Winner (DoCE/VND)
FORMER SENIOR MODERATOR
8+ years of Battledawn
|
|
| Top |
|
|
generated-KrEc5gbTAqLC-1608557600
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:56 pm |
|
| Private |
|
|
|
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2020 8:33 am
Posts: 0
Gender: male
|
gaurav1 wrote: Eh this is a horrible indicator of CHAM players activity and tactics vs CBop. CBop came into the round looking to be active and play seriously for a win. CHAM is made up of all players that were either here to just watch or train fellow friends.
CHAM when it is its usual UN alliance with all members are definitely an alliance to be feared. Most of the CBop guys found that out last E4 when they lost to UN and allies. I am sure CHAM will regroup even this era and I don't think CBop will find that too be as easy as they think this war might be atm.
Still very early in this round and this war. From what I observed in E4, the deciding factor was not UN, who got beat up until LION joined that war. If they were here to 'just watch' and 'train' why are most of them mass boosters?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
